The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non notable singer who doesn’t satisfy any criterion from
WP:SINGER neither does she possess in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of her. A before search turned up non notable sources such as
this which lacks editorial oversight & interviews such as
this which aren’t considered reliable since they aren’t independent of her. Celestina007 (
talk)
23:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete. Musicians are not automatically notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia just because they exist — we're an encyclopedia, not a free public relations platform, and the inclusion bar for musicians as spelled out at
WP:NMUSIC requires quantifiable and
reliably sourceableaccomplishments, not just verification of existence. But the article states nothing about NIIVA that passes any of NMUSIC's criteria, and it's referenced overwhelmingly to
primary sources and
blogs, which are not support for notability. Out of 15 footnotes here, the only one that's actually starting to get anywhere is #2 (
Global News) — but it takes a lot more than just one hit of coverage in real media to deem a person as passing
WP:GNG in lieu of having to pass the actual inclusion criteria for their occupation.
Bearcat (
talk)
18:04, 28 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - clearly not yet notable as the sourcing that is independent lacks the appropriate level of depth, also no evidence of charting or being nominated for any accolades that would make her notable
Spiderone(Talk to Spider)20:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non notable singer who doesn’t satisfy any criterion from
WP:SINGER neither does she possess in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of her. A before search turned up non notable sources such as
this which lacks editorial oversight & interviews such as
this which aren’t considered reliable since they aren’t independent of her. Celestina007 (
talk)
23:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete. Musicians are not automatically notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia just because they exist — we're an encyclopedia, not a free public relations platform, and the inclusion bar for musicians as spelled out at
WP:NMUSIC requires quantifiable and
reliably sourceableaccomplishments, not just verification of existence. But the article states nothing about NIIVA that passes any of NMUSIC's criteria, and it's referenced overwhelmingly to
primary sources and
blogs, which are not support for notability. Out of 15 footnotes here, the only one that's actually starting to get anywhere is #2 (
Global News) — but it takes a lot more than just one hit of coverage in real media to deem a person as passing
WP:GNG in lieu of having to pass the actual inclusion criteria for their occupation.
Bearcat (
talk)
18:04, 28 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - clearly not yet notable as the sourcing that is independent lacks the appropriate level of depth, also no evidence of charting or being nominated for any accolades that would make her notable
Spiderone(Talk to Spider)20:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.