The result was no consensus. There is a consensus that this article shouldn't remain as it is, but no consensus to delete. Probably the best solution would be some kind of merge, but that hasn't been discussed enough here for it to be a viable close. I suggest people discuss a possible merge target, or given the level of participation in this discussion, a bold merge would also be perfectly acceptable. — Mr. Stradivarius ( have a chat) 07:22, 8 September 2012 (UTC) reply
One reliable source is given (which is a single sentence from Mr. Vinci's webpage about his composition for CBS); otherwise, there are multiple violations of WP:LINKVIO and loads of original research. Relevant details about the current theme are already found at Posthumus Zone. RJaguar3 | u | t 17:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. There is a consensus that this article shouldn't remain as it is, but no consensus to delete. Probably the best solution would be some kind of merge, but that hasn't been discussed enough here for it to be a viable close. I suggest people discuss a possible merge target, or given the level of participation in this discussion, a bold merge would also be perfectly acceptable. — Mr. Stradivarius ( have a chat) 07:22, 8 September 2012 (UTC) reply
One reliable source is given (which is a single sentence from Mr. Vinci's webpage about his composition for CBS); otherwise, there are multiple violations of WP:LINKVIO and loads of original research. Relevant details about the current theme are already found at Posthumus Zone. RJaguar3 | u | t 17:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC) reply