The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
lowkickmma.com Mention of only 37 words. As suggested by
WP:100WORDS this source doesn't count as significant coverage, and not the most reliable outlet as well, more like a martial arts blog. N
Redirect to
Hapkido#Myung Jae-Nam. He already has a section in the main Hapkido article. I'll admit it seems that significant independent coverage is lacking, but he is clearly a significant figure in hapkido's history. Perhaps a few things can be added from the existing individual article to his section in the hapkido article, although I was bothered by the lack of significant independent coverage in the
Hankido,
Hankumdo, and
International H.K.D. Federation articles. Anyway, I strongly believe the redirect is a better choice than outright deletion.
Papaursa (
talk)
14:18, 12 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
lowkickmma.com Mention of only 37 words. As suggested by
WP:100WORDS this source doesn't count as significant coverage, and not the most reliable outlet as well, more like a martial arts blog. N
Redirect to
Hapkido#Myung Jae-Nam. He already has a section in the main Hapkido article. I'll admit it seems that significant independent coverage is lacking, but he is clearly a significant figure in hapkido's history. Perhaps a few things can be added from the existing individual article to his section in the hapkido article, although I was bothered by the lack of significant independent coverage in the
Hankido,
Hankumdo, and
International H.K.D. Federation articles. Anyway, I strongly believe the redirect is a better choice than outright deletion.
Papaursa (
talk)
14:18, 12 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.