- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (Sorry for any confusion, I got the wrong button when trying to close this) The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 01:36, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- My Son Is Gay ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Son Is Gay Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not qualifies WP:NFO or WP:GNG, no signs of notability, no reliable sources found to establish this is a notable movie. thanks QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:45, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:46, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:46, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter ( talk) 16:01, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep the movie has received coverage in
WP:RS and meets the criteria of
WP:Film. --
Harshil169 (
talk)
03:24, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Harshil169, WP:FILM is not a criteria it's a project. You can find criteria for movies WP:NFO here. QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:59, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: Per sources that are in the article. Even a quick Google search reveal sources such as
this and
this.
SL93 (
talk)
15:44, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
-
SL93, Yes there are news articles but, how that is going to fullfil
WP:NFO?? having news is not enough and that doesn't mark the notability. coverage should be for some longer time. Such films are new so they are destined to be reported in news but that doesn't mean they are notable. Probably my understanding of
WP:NFO would have been limited, but I would love to hear from you on, how these films are notable under NFO.
QueerEcofeminist
"cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their]
18:01, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- You're actually the second person who I came across recently who confused "Other evidence of notability" as what is required. Those are listed for if the general notability guidelines (
WP:N) isn't satisfied which is "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list." There is no requirement anywhere for needing coverage from a longer time. Not all films appear in the news per my experience in trying to create film articles.
SL93 (
talk)
18:08, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
-
SL93, * I will try and ignore your personal comments.
- The sources you suggested seems to be unreliable as, Asian Movie Plus is self-publishing (They kind of collect half of the review from you and then add to it)
- The Second source ( thenewsminute) you suggested is similarly problematic, as their editorial processes are unknown. QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 08:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
-
SL93, * I will try and ignore your personal comments.
- You're actually the second person who I came across recently who confused "Other evidence of notability" as what is required. Those are listed for if the general notability guidelines (
WP:N) isn't satisfied which is "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list." There is no requirement anywhere for needing coverage from a longer time. Not all films appear in the news per my experience in trying to create film articles.
SL93 (
talk)
18:08, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
-
SL93, Yes there are news articles but, how that is going to fullfil
WP:NFO?? having news is not enough and that doesn't mark the notability. coverage should be for some longer time. Such films are new so they are destined to be reported in news but that doesn't mean they are notable. Probably my understanding of
WP:NFO would have been limited, but I would love to hear from you on, how these films are notable under NFO.
QueerEcofeminist
"cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their]
18:01, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment – It seems this film is yet to be released, per this article of The Hindu. BTW, its alternative name is En Magan Magizhvan, which might help in searching the relevant sources, e.g. see here. - NitinMlk ( talk) 16:56, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The provided sources need additional discussion, it is unclear if GNG is met.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MrClog ( talk) 10:24, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Relisting comment: The provided sources need additional discussion, it is unclear if GNG is met.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MrClog ( talk) 10:24, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This is quite notable. Maybe just some simple improvements would bring it up to standard. CLCStudent ( talk) 20:55, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Delete: This is not even officially released in India or anywhere, according to [ |this] and [ |this]. So I don't know how it fits in to the frame of notability WP:NFF thanks QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 14:07, 11 August 2019 (UTC)- There is no need for you to vote when you nominated this for deletion. SL93 ( talk) 16:44, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:55, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:55, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep current references are enough to meet WP:GNG. Pichpich ( talk) 19:23, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (Sorry for any confusion, I got the wrong button when trying to close this) The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 01:36, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- My Son Is Gay ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Son Is Gay Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not qualifies WP:NFO or WP:GNG, no signs of notability, no reliable sources found to establish this is a notable movie. thanks QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:45, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:46, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:46, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter ( talk) 16:01, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep the movie has received coverage in
WP:RS and meets the criteria of
WP:Film. --
Harshil169 (
talk)
03:24, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Harshil169, WP:FILM is not a criteria it's a project. You can find criteria for movies WP:NFO here. QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:59, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: Per sources that are in the article. Even a quick Google search reveal sources such as
this and
this.
SL93 (
talk)
15:44, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
-
SL93, Yes there are news articles but, how that is going to fullfil
WP:NFO?? having news is not enough and that doesn't mark the notability. coverage should be for some longer time. Such films are new so they are destined to be reported in news but that doesn't mean they are notable. Probably my understanding of
WP:NFO would have been limited, but I would love to hear from you on, how these films are notable under NFO.
QueerEcofeminist
"cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their]
18:01, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- You're actually the second person who I came across recently who confused "Other evidence of notability" as what is required. Those are listed for if the general notability guidelines (
WP:N) isn't satisfied which is "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list." There is no requirement anywhere for needing coverage from a longer time. Not all films appear in the news per my experience in trying to create film articles.
SL93 (
talk)
18:08, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
-
SL93, * I will try and ignore your personal comments.
- The sources you suggested seems to be unreliable as, Asian Movie Plus is self-publishing (They kind of collect half of the review from you and then add to it)
- The Second source ( thenewsminute) you suggested is similarly problematic, as their editorial processes are unknown. QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 08:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
-
SL93, * I will try and ignore your personal comments.
- You're actually the second person who I came across recently who confused "Other evidence of notability" as what is required. Those are listed for if the general notability guidelines (
WP:N) isn't satisfied which is "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list." There is no requirement anywhere for needing coverage from a longer time. Not all films appear in the news per my experience in trying to create film articles.
SL93 (
talk)
18:08, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
-
SL93, Yes there are news articles but, how that is going to fullfil
WP:NFO?? having news is not enough and that doesn't mark the notability. coverage should be for some longer time. Such films are new so they are destined to be reported in news but that doesn't mean they are notable. Probably my understanding of
WP:NFO would have been limited, but I would love to hear from you on, how these films are notable under NFO.
QueerEcofeminist
"cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their]
18:01, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment – It seems this film is yet to be released, per this article of The Hindu. BTW, its alternative name is En Magan Magizhvan, which might help in searching the relevant sources, e.g. see here. - NitinMlk ( talk) 16:56, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The provided sources need additional discussion, it is unclear if GNG is met.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MrClog ( talk) 10:24, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Relisting comment: The provided sources need additional discussion, it is unclear if GNG is met.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MrClog ( talk) 10:24, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This is quite notable. Maybe just some simple improvements would bring it up to standard. CLCStudent ( talk) 20:55, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Delete: This is not even officially released in India or anywhere, according to [ |this] and [ |this]. So I don't know how it fits in to the frame of notability WP:NFF thanks QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 14:07, 11 August 2019 (UTC)- There is no need for you to vote when you nominated this for deletion. SL93 ( talk) 16:44, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:55, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:55, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep current references are enough to meet WP:GNG. Pichpich ( talk) 19:23, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.