The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 05:13, 2 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Having reviewed the previous AfD, I think the editors involved were in error. This case is not notable, and the claim made that the victim was notable before being murdered is not supported in the existing article, nor by a cursory search for reliable sources.
In addition, claims of the connection of this case to the sexual abuse scandal in the Catholic Church is not supported by reliable sources.
I think this article was voted into existence, rather than a careful consideration being given to the arguments presented by the keepers. But there is no deadline. So delete. Cerejota ( talk) 22:03, 16 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete per WP:VICTIM. As I stated in the previous AFD, the subject's only real claim to notability is the fact that he was murdered. The prior AFD can be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Kunz (Catholic priest). 4meter4 ( talk) 23:32, 16 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 05:13, 2 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Having reviewed the previous AfD, I think the editors involved were in error. This case is not notable, and the claim made that the victim was notable before being murdered is not supported in the existing article, nor by a cursory search for reliable sources.
In addition, claims of the connection of this case to the sexual abuse scandal in the Catholic Church is not supported by reliable sources.
I think this article was voted into existence, rather than a careful consideration being given to the arguments presented by the keepers. But there is no deadline. So delete. Cerejota ( talk) 22:03, 16 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete per WP:VICTIM. As I stated in the previous AFD, the subject's only real claim to notability is the fact that he was murdered. The prior AFD can be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Kunz (Catholic priest). 4meter4 ( talk) 23:32, 16 August 2011 (UTC) reply