The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep, notable according to criteria--
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Non-notable Russian band. This could probably have gone under G11, but am bringing here for a more thorough discussion. KDS4444Talk 15:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
I've struck your comment - Please comment on the article not the contributor!, If I see you make another attack like that again I'll have you blocked. –
Davey2010Talk 00:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)`reply
I didn't comment on the contributor but on his contribution. The Article exists in 18 languages. So it does not require much research to gasp that the band is notable. The AfD-originator was on a crusade on that day with several similar worded AfDs without substance.
Arved (
talk) 11:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Either way it's still commenting on the contributor, If it's notable then it's the "!Keepers" job to find sources .... Not !vote on the basis of "it's a troll afd", Again I've struck your !vote as replacing the letter O with an aterisk isn't any better ...... Just overwrite your !vote with sources..... –
Davey2010Talk 12:35, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Well obviously it is not so obivious what is wrong with this AfD, The band was an ESC contestant, is frequently touring the US and Europe; Played at the last Olympics in Sochi. Has Press coverage (Just click on the link above) and even has a
bar named after the band. And he claims it is "non-notable". The Contributor obviously has not even read the article before putting it on Afd. How do you call this?
Arved (
talk) 17:32, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 00:35, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep, notable according to criteria--
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Non-notable Russian band. This could probably have gone under G11, but am bringing here for a more thorough discussion. KDS4444Talk 15:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
I've struck your comment - Please comment on the article not the contributor!, If I see you make another attack like that again I'll have you blocked. –
Davey2010Talk 00:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)`reply
I didn't comment on the contributor but on his contribution. The Article exists in 18 languages. So it does not require much research to gasp that the band is notable. The AfD-originator was on a crusade on that day with several similar worded AfDs without substance.
Arved (
talk) 11:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Either way it's still commenting on the contributor, If it's notable then it's the "!Keepers" job to find sources .... Not !vote on the basis of "it's a troll afd", Again I've struck your !vote as replacing the letter O with an aterisk isn't any better ...... Just overwrite your !vote with sources..... –
Davey2010Talk 12:35, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Well obviously it is not so obivious what is wrong with this AfD, The band was an ESC contestant, is frequently touring the US and Europe; Played at the last Olympics in Sochi. Has Press coverage (Just click on the link above) and even has a
bar named after the band. And he claims it is "non-notable". The Contributor obviously has not even read the article before putting it on Afd. How do you call this?
Arved (
talk) 17:32, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 00:35, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.