- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure) samee talk 05:28, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Muhammad Ahmed Ludhianvi
- Muhammad Ahmed Ludhianvi ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
the subject regularly appears in the news for being the chief of an entity but I think he fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN, not an elected MP. Saqib ( talk) 04:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Strong keep: how does he not meet GNG? Three of the six sources explicitly have his name in the headline itself, and are to major national-level Pakistani newspapers. He's the head of one of the most prominent proscribed militant groups in the country. Nobody is claiming he meets Notability as a politician (since he wasn't seated) but simply his leadership of ASWJ and the coverage he's had in that capacity easily meet GNG. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 05:13, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train Discuss 05:14, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. MT Train Discuss 05:14, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MT Train Discuss 05:14, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Withdraw I think I've misread this BLP.. the subject may fail POLITICIAN but indeed pass GNG. -- Saqib ( talk) 05:22, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure) samee talk 05:28, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Muhammad Ahmed Ludhianvi
- Muhammad Ahmed Ludhianvi ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
the subject regularly appears in the news for being the chief of an entity but I think he fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN, not an elected MP. Saqib ( talk) 04:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Strong keep: how does he not meet GNG? Three of the six sources explicitly have his name in the headline itself, and are to major national-level Pakistani newspapers. He's the head of one of the most prominent proscribed militant groups in the country. Nobody is claiming he meets Notability as a politician (since he wasn't seated) but simply his leadership of ASWJ and the coverage he's had in that capacity easily meet GNG. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 05:13, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train Discuss 05:14, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. MT Train Discuss 05:14, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MT Train Discuss 05:14, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Withdraw I think I've misread this BLP.. the subject may fail POLITICIAN but indeed pass GNG. -- Saqib ( talk) 05:22, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.