- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Editors are encouraged to add any of the sources to the article to prevent renomination in the near future. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 10:30, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Mrwhosetheboss
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mrwhosetheboss ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:GNG Ari T. Benchaim ( talk) 01:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Ari T. Benchaim ( talk) 01:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep for the same reason provided by the proposer. Skyshifter talk 01:56, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Internet, and England. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- WP:GNG? Yes, I do agree that he passes GNG, not unequivocally, but just barely. Now why don't you see if you can change your degree for how you determine notability?
- ...If you didn't understand my bars, I'm voting a Keep. PantheonRadiance ( talk) 20:09, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 18:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep It meets GNG to an extent, and I did a small search for sources, there are some, so the article could probably be fixed up. | Zippybonzo | Talk | 10:06, 1 June 2022
- Comment - After a few days of searching, I have also found multiple other sources about his work in addition to the ones I posted already. For starters, his 3D smartphone hologram video has been the subject of multiple RS, including The Daily Dot, CNBC, Motherboard (Vice), two Huffington Post articles, and even on Time magazine. I added the former two sources in the article a few days ago.
- Various other videos of his have been used for analytical purposes regarding technology, such as in Insider, BGR, The Verge, and The Indian Express. Also, one of his videos explaining an Instagram mystery was also the subject of significant coverage as well in an article from UNILAD.
- Finally, he won a Streamy Award in 2021 for the category of Technology, passing #2 of WP:WEBCRIT. I think Mrwhosetheboss definitely passes WP:GNG and WP:WEB. The sources demonstrably show that he is a notable tech YouTuber whose videos have been showcased and described in multiple sources. I stand by my Keep vote. PantheonRadiance ( talk) 21:35, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, as the article fails the notability guidelines. Also the sources mentioned above are just brief mentions and are not good at establishing notability per WP:REFBOMB. Sahaib ( talk) 13:08, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Enough coverage per above to meet GNG. Seacactus 13 ( talk) 18:47, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Editors are encouraged to add any of the sources to the article to prevent renomination in the near future. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 10:30, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Mrwhosetheboss
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mrwhosetheboss ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:GNG Ari T. Benchaim ( talk) 01:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Ari T. Benchaim ( talk) 01:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep for the same reason provided by the proposer. Skyshifter talk 01:56, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Internet, and England. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- WP:GNG? Yes, I do agree that he passes GNG, not unequivocally, but just barely. Now why don't you see if you can change your degree for how you determine notability?
- ...If you didn't understand my bars, I'm voting a Keep. PantheonRadiance ( talk) 20:09, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 18:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep It meets GNG to an extent, and I did a small search for sources, there are some, so the article could probably be fixed up. | Zippybonzo | Talk | 10:06, 1 June 2022
- Comment - After a few days of searching, I have also found multiple other sources about his work in addition to the ones I posted already. For starters, his 3D smartphone hologram video has been the subject of multiple RS, including The Daily Dot, CNBC, Motherboard (Vice), two Huffington Post articles, and even on Time magazine. I added the former two sources in the article a few days ago.
- Various other videos of his have been used for analytical purposes regarding technology, such as in Insider, BGR, The Verge, and The Indian Express. Also, one of his videos explaining an Instagram mystery was also the subject of significant coverage as well in an article from UNILAD.
- Finally, he won a Streamy Award in 2021 for the category of Technology, passing #2 of WP:WEBCRIT. I think Mrwhosetheboss definitely passes WP:GNG and WP:WEB. The sources demonstrably show that he is a notable tech YouTuber whose videos have been showcased and described in multiple sources. I stand by my Keep vote. PantheonRadiance ( talk) 21:35, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, as the article fails the notability guidelines. Also the sources mentioned above are just brief mentions and are not good at establishing notability per WP:REFBOMB. Sahaib ( talk) 13:08, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Enough coverage per above to meet GNG. Seacactus 13 ( talk) 18:47, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.