The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I can't see that there is enough here to pass
WP:NCORP or
WP:GNG. This band has a
very small catalogue of releases and none of the bands or albums seem to be notable.
Bhelliom had an article but it was deleted as A7 all the way back in 2007. There is a tiny bit of (promotional sounding)
info at this website but I found little else. The label is listed on Discogs but I don't believe that it makes it notable by default.
Spiderone13:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete unnotable label. During a google search I only found discogs, metal archives, reverbnation, spirit of metal and blogspot.
Results No evidence of reliable sources, no evidence of notability.
GhostDestroyer100 (
talk)
14:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - the best source I could find was spirit of metal, which was merely a directory listing, aside from the point I don't know if it is reliable or not. Does not pass GNG, does not appear to meet NMUSIC#5, and there is
no verification it has had any cultural impact on a genre or regional music scene.
78.26(
spin me /
revolutions)18:10, 13 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Spirit of Metal is not listed at
WP:ALBUMAVOID, which makes it hard to determine the reliability of a site. But I think it's unreliable. Even though it calls itself a webzine, it looks much more like a database to me. It always lists bands and other stuff in a database-like way (the basic facts listed, and even then, many times they are incorrect, for example, about the year the band was founded). So I wouldn't count on it.
GhostDestroyer100 (
talk)
14:48, 14 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I can't see that there is enough here to pass
WP:NCORP or
WP:GNG. This band has a
very small catalogue of releases and none of the bands or albums seem to be notable.
Bhelliom had an article but it was deleted as A7 all the way back in 2007. There is a tiny bit of (promotional sounding)
info at this website but I found little else. The label is listed on Discogs but I don't believe that it makes it notable by default.
Spiderone13:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete unnotable label. During a google search I only found discogs, metal archives, reverbnation, spirit of metal and blogspot.
Results No evidence of reliable sources, no evidence of notability.
GhostDestroyer100 (
talk)
14:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - the best source I could find was spirit of metal, which was merely a directory listing, aside from the point I don't know if it is reliable or not. Does not pass GNG, does not appear to meet NMUSIC#5, and there is
no verification it has had any cultural impact on a genre or regional music scene.
78.26(
spin me /
revolutions)18:10, 13 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Spirit of Metal is not listed at
WP:ALBUMAVOID, which makes it hard to determine the reliability of a site. But I think it's unreliable. Even though it calls itself a webzine, it looks much more like a database to me. It always lists bands and other stuff in a database-like way (the basic facts listed, and even then, many times they are incorrect, for example, about the year the band was founded). So I wouldn't count on it.
GhostDestroyer100 (
talk)
14:48, 14 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.