The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not-notable model railroad exhibition? This is your view user WikiDan61! Have you seen this exhibition? Are you model railroaders? Prod removed by a single purpose account? Where is the problem?--
Feliz Nuevo (
talk) 20:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC) —
Feliz Nuevo (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Note that
User:Feliz Nuevo has no edits outside of the scope of this discussion. --Kinut/c 17:13, 31 January 2014 (UTC)reply
CommentNotability isn't conferred by the impressiveness of the exhibition, but by signficant coverage in reliable sources. The brochure of the exhibition, or its website, or the website of the castle (which, by the way, appears to fail to mention the exhibition at all) do not count as reliable, independent sources. Find some actual sources, and the story here might change. As for my comment about "PROD removed by a single purpose account", that refers to the fact that new users who register solely for the purpose of commenting on deletion processes generally raise red flags, due to their unfamiliarity with Wikipedia policies and guidelines, and to the possibility that such accounts are
created maliciously to subvert the deletion process. That is not the only reason such accounts are created, but it does become a factor in the deletion decision process.
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)reply
WikiDan61 your comment is nonsense! What is your contribution to this article?--
Feliz Nuevo (
talk) 20:51, 16 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Surprisingly enough, the topic technically passes the notability threshold. The exhibition received coverage in national Swiss media, including
Swiss television (
[1]) and the NZZ newspaper (
[2]). However, technical notability aside, this is a temporary exhibition about a niche topic in a small country, and of exceedingly limited interest to everybody but a very few people. A mention in the article
Hünegg Castle is quite enough; Wikipedia is not an events guide. What's more, the article is very incompetently written (it reads like a machine translation) and would need a complete rewrite. It doesn't look like any of the editors of the article are up to the task, and I'm not going to spend an hour recreating an article about this exceedingly trivial topic. Sandstein 20:33, 18 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Excuse my English. Very good article. Why delete? Message in the Swiss radio and television, in the NZZ, in the magazine Eisenbahn Amateur
Eisenbahn Amateur. It is one of the first exhibitions this topic completely. Mountain railways are extremely important for Switzerland (tourism, transit traffic).--
Schönegg (
talk) 10:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment The rationale behind the nomination of this article for deletion was given at the time of nomination: it does not meet the
criteria for inclusion based on Wikipedia guidelines. Please provide a guideline-based argument for its retention.
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:15, 23 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment Further to Paintitup's comments (which were updated after my first reply): you're right, those articles are pretty bad and should probably be deleted. But that's a different discussion. We're talking about
Mountain railways special exhibition in the Hünegg Castel, and the argument that we should keep this article because
other stuff exists is a weak one.
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:24, 23 January 2014 (UTC)reply
I can not understand that. Then delete first the others - smile...--
Paintitup (
talk) 19:34, 23 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Please see
WP:WAX and
WP:OTHERSTUFF. The presence or absence of other articles, or whether or not other articles should or should not be deleted, is irrelevant to whether or not this article should be deleted. -
The BushrangerOne ping only 03:53, 24 January 2014 (UTC)reply
@The Bushranger is that all you can think to do this? I find your comments on this page a little crazy. Do you have a problem with the Switzerland? @The Bushranger and @WikiDan61: Why do you speak only by deleting the text her, and why you speak not by a transfer to the Hünegg Castle? Why do you not change the guidelines? Where is it written that guidelines kept must be strict?--
Paintitup (
talk) 06:11, 24 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Paint -- this is not the venue to discuss changing the notability standards by which Wikipedia editors evaluate articles. If you wish
tilt at that windmill, you should open a discussion at
Wikipedia talk:Notability. You wouldn't be the first, and likely you wouldn't be the last. As for a transfer of the text to the article about
Hünegg Castle, there is already a mention of the exhibit at that article. Based on the scant coverage available for the event, I think that mention is sufficient: any expansion would have to rely on the unreliable primary sources on which the present article is based.
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:13, 24 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Paint: Which person do you think??? Based on the scant coverage available for the event... What a nonsense you WikiDan61!--
Paintitup (
talk) 20:42, 24 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Stifle (
talk) 17:48, 26 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Not only boys. Girls also! And now train wrecks! Objects of cultural value! Smile. To move the text to the Castle Hünegg is imaginable. However, this should make those no want independent articlebecause of the crazy paragraphs. Don't think this is not really clever. This can end like in en monster article. As example:
Trolleybus (German). @Andrew: When Boys always want to stage train wrecks with their model railways do not make anything more stupid. Hang about, to fume cigar form Cuba, write article in Wikipedia…--
Paintitup (
talk) 18:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Merge as appropriate to
Hünegg Castle as indicated above. There is some discussion in
WP:RS, although I would say that only a few of the included sources appear reliable and useful for determining notability. However, most of it appears to be
WP:ROUTINE coverage. As it was a temporary exhibition, I do not see a level of
WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE to warrant a standalone article. --Kinut/c 17:17, 31 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Merge per Kinu.--
Charles (
talk) 19:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not-notable model railroad exhibition? This is your view user WikiDan61! Have you seen this exhibition? Are you model railroaders? Prod removed by a single purpose account? Where is the problem?--
Feliz Nuevo (
talk) 20:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC) —
Feliz Nuevo (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Note that
User:Feliz Nuevo has no edits outside of the scope of this discussion. --Kinut/c 17:13, 31 January 2014 (UTC)reply
CommentNotability isn't conferred by the impressiveness of the exhibition, but by signficant coverage in reliable sources. The brochure of the exhibition, or its website, or the website of the castle (which, by the way, appears to fail to mention the exhibition at all) do not count as reliable, independent sources. Find some actual sources, and the story here might change. As for my comment about "PROD removed by a single purpose account", that refers to the fact that new users who register solely for the purpose of commenting on deletion processes generally raise red flags, due to their unfamiliarity with Wikipedia policies and guidelines, and to the possibility that such accounts are
created maliciously to subvert the deletion process. That is not the only reason such accounts are created, but it does become a factor in the deletion decision process.
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)reply
WikiDan61 your comment is nonsense! What is your contribution to this article?--
Feliz Nuevo (
talk) 20:51, 16 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Surprisingly enough, the topic technically passes the notability threshold. The exhibition received coverage in national Swiss media, including
Swiss television (
[1]) and the NZZ newspaper (
[2]). However, technical notability aside, this is a temporary exhibition about a niche topic in a small country, and of exceedingly limited interest to everybody but a very few people. A mention in the article
Hünegg Castle is quite enough; Wikipedia is not an events guide. What's more, the article is very incompetently written (it reads like a machine translation) and would need a complete rewrite. It doesn't look like any of the editors of the article are up to the task, and I'm not going to spend an hour recreating an article about this exceedingly trivial topic. Sandstein 20:33, 18 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Excuse my English. Very good article. Why delete? Message in the Swiss radio and television, in the NZZ, in the magazine Eisenbahn Amateur
Eisenbahn Amateur. It is one of the first exhibitions this topic completely. Mountain railways are extremely important for Switzerland (tourism, transit traffic).--
Schönegg (
talk) 10:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment The rationale behind the nomination of this article for deletion was given at the time of nomination: it does not meet the
criteria for inclusion based on Wikipedia guidelines. Please provide a guideline-based argument for its retention.
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:15, 23 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment Further to Paintitup's comments (which were updated after my first reply): you're right, those articles are pretty bad and should probably be deleted. But that's a different discussion. We're talking about
Mountain railways special exhibition in the Hünegg Castel, and the argument that we should keep this article because
other stuff exists is a weak one.
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:24, 23 January 2014 (UTC)reply
I can not understand that. Then delete first the others - smile...--
Paintitup (
talk) 19:34, 23 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Please see
WP:WAX and
WP:OTHERSTUFF. The presence or absence of other articles, or whether or not other articles should or should not be deleted, is irrelevant to whether or not this article should be deleted. -
The BushrangerOne ping only 03:53, 24 January 2014 (UTC)reply
@The Bushranger is that all you can think to do this? I find your comments on this page a little crazy. Do you have a problem with the Switzerland? @The Bushranger and @WikiDan61: Why do you speak only by deleting the text her, and why you speak not by a transfer to the Hünegg Castle? Why do you not change the guidelines? Where is it written that guidelines kept must be strict?--
Paintitup (
talk) 06:11, 24 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Paint -- this is not the venue to discuss changing the notability standards by which Wikipedia editors evaluate articles. If you wish
tilt at that windmill, you should open a discussion at
Wikipedia talk:Notability. You wouldn't be the first, and likely you wouldn't be the last. As for a transfer of the text to the article about
Hünegg Castle, there is already a mention of the exhibit at that article. Based on the scant coverage available for the event, I think that mention is sufficient: any expansion would have to rely on the unreliable primary sources on which the present article is based.
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:13, 24 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Paint: Which person do you think??? Based on the scant coverage available for the event... What a nonsense you WikiDan61!--
Paintitup (
talk) 20:42, 24 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Stifle (
talk) 17:48, 26 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Not only boys. Girls also! And now train wrecks! Objects of cultural value! Smile. To move the text to the Castle Hünegg is imaginable. However, this should make those no want independent articlebecause of the crazy paragraphs. Don't think this is not really clever. This can end like in en monster article. As example:
Trolleybus (German). @Andrew: When Boys always want to stage train wrecks with their model railways do not make anything more stupid. Hang about, to fume cigar form Cuba, write article in Wikipedia…--
Paintitup (
talk) 18:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Merge as appropriate to
Hünegg Castle as indicated above. There is some discussion in
WP:RS, although I would say that only a few of the included sources appear reliable and useful for determining notability. However, most of it appears to be
WP:ROUTINE coverage. As it was a temporary exhibition, I do not see a level of
WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE to warrant a standalone article. --Kinut/c 17:17, 31 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Merge per Kinu.--
Charles (
talk) 19:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.