The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable lawyer & diplomat. Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:ANYBIO in that the references cited are only mentions in passing. There is no inherent notability in either being a 'legal adviser' to a Government Department nor being ambassador. The prize mentioned is a high school prize (and not a notable prize either).
Dan arndt (
talk) 07:08, 28 October 2016 (UTC)reply
delete no inherent notability in any of the roles. A mere 3 gnews hits. Fails WP:BIO.
LibStar (
talk) 11:11, 28 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep - Per
WP:DIPLOMAT: " If an individual who is, or was, the "head of mission" meets the criteria in a well-respected essay (such as
WP:SOLDIER) an individual biography article can be created ". Therefore, since the subject was a head of mission. It justifies the presence of this article.
Cossde (
talk) 16:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)reply
that's an essay. There is no inherent notability of ambassadors. This has been clear consensus on this as many ambassador articles have been deleted.
LibStar (
talk) 16:19, 28 October 2016 (UTC)reply
the articles about the sea bed dispute are just one line mentions. Not in depth coverage.
LibStar (
talk) 10:37, 30 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete We lack articles that provide indepth coverage and none of his positions give a presumption of notability.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 23:08, 28 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete As this is not a notable individual.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk) 00:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable lawyer & diplomat. Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:ANYBIO in that the references cited are only mentions in passing. There is no inherent notability in either being a 'legal adviser' to a Government Department nor being ambassador. The prize mentioned is a high school prize (and not a notable prize either).
Dan arndt (
talk) 07:08, 28 October 2016 (UTC)reply
delete no inherent notability in any of the roles. A mere 3 gnews hits. Fails WP:BIO.
LibStar (
talk) 11:11, 28 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep - Per
WP:DIPLOMAT: " If an individual who is, or was, the "head of mission" meets the criteria in a well-respected essay (such as
WP:SOLDIER) an individual biography article can be created ". Therefore, since the subject was a head of mission. It justifies the presence of this article.
Cossde (
talk) 16:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)reply
that's an essay. There is no inherent notability of ambassadors. This has been clear consensus on this as many ambassador articles have been deleted.
LibStar (
talk) 16:19, 28 October 2016 (UTC)reply
the articles about the sea bed dispute are just one line mentions. Not in depth coverage.
LibStar (
talk) 10:37, 30 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete We lack articles that provide indepth coverage and none of his positions give a presumption of notability.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 23:08, 28 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete As this is not a notable individual.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk) 00:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.