- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Devourment. T. Canens ( talk) 04:33, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Molesting the Decapitated
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Molesting the Decapitated ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I find not enough to help the article meet WP:GNG. A quick search found mentions in the usual metal webzines and websites, none of which are RSes. https://www.allmusic.com/album/molesting-the-decapitated-mw0002047686 is simply a database entry: no review or rating. Important content can be merged to the band article. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 20:44, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 20:44, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep — I do definitely think the article deserves to be here especially if you’re knowledged in slam. If
Devourment themselves can have a Wikipedia article then it should come with the territory that their most notorious album should as well. It just doesn’t feel right to have it missing.
Second Skin (
talk)
20:51, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- If you could supply sources to support the claim that it deserves to be here, that would help determine why. Notability is
not inherited. Not every work of a notable band is itself notable.
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
21:04, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Yah I know which is why I said this album in particular is their most notable work, and besides I already edited the page and added a source before I even commented lol.
Second Skin (
talk)
08:45, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- I am sure that you aware that http://relapse.com/devourment-obscene-majesty/ is a primary source. The label is linked to the band and does not help the subject meet WP:GNG, and their job is to hype the band. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 21:24, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Yah I know which is why I said this album in particular is their most notable work, and besides I already edited the page and added a source before I even commented lol.
Second Skin (
talk)
08:45, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- None of that constitutes a valid reason to keep an article. Notability isn’t inherited, and unsourced claims of importance or weird baseless comments like "it wouldn’t feel right” aren’t policy-based either. Sergecross73 msg me 22:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- If you could supply sources to support the claim that it deserves to be here, that would help determine why. Notability is
not inherited. Not every work of a notable band is itself notable.
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
21:04, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - lacks independent notability - fails the WP:GNG. Will reconsider if sources are found (Not gonna lie, didn’t exactly want to do a deep dive on source searching with this one, considering where the false positive could take someone...) Sergecross73 msg me 22:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to Devourment: Barely found anything about the album. ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 06:15, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Devourment. T. Canens ( talk) 04:33, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Molesting the Decapitated
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Molesting the Decapitated ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I find not enough to help the article meet WP:GNG. A quick search found mentions in the usual metal webzines and websites, none of which are RSes. https://www.allmusic.com/album/molesting-the-decapitated-mw0002047686 is simply a database entry: no review or rating. Important content can be merged to the band article. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 20:44, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 20:44, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep — I do definitely think the article deserves to be here especially if you’re knowledged in slam. If
Devourment themselves can have a Wikipedia article then it should come with the territory that their most notorious album should as well. It just doesn’t feel right to have it missing.
Second Skin (
talk)
20:51, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- If you could supply sources to support the claim that it deserves to be here, that would help determine why. Notability is
not inherited. Not every work of a notable band is itself notable.
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
21:04, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Yah I know which is why I said this album in particular is their most notable work, and besides I already edited the page and added a source before I even commented lol.
Second Skin (
talk)
08:45, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- I am sure that you aware that http://relapse.com/devourment-obscene-majesty/ is a primary source. The label is linked to the band and does not help the subject meet WP:GNG, and their job is to hype the band. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 21:24, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Yah I know which is why I said this album in particular is their most notable work, and besides I already edited the page and added a source before I even commented lol.
Second Skin (
talk)
08:45, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- None of that constitutes a valid reason to keep an article. Notability isn’t inherited, and unsourced claims of importance or weird baseless comments like "it wouldn’t feel right” aren’t policy-based either. Sergecross73 msg me 22:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- If you could supply sources to support the claim that it deserves to be here, that would help determine why. Notability is
not inherited. Not every work of a notable band is itself notable.
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
21:04, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - lacks independent notability - fails the WP:GNG. Will reconsider if sources are found (Not gonna lie, didn’t exactly want to do a deep dive on source searching with this one, considering where the false positive could take someone...) Sergecross73 msg me 22:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to Devourment: Barely found anything about the album. ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 06:15, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.