The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
My searches have found nothing noticeably better and the other two Wikis offer nothing else better. I'm willing to reconsider if substantially better can be found.
SwisterTwistertalk 07:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:31, 30 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170etalk 01:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep.
WP:NACTOR sets an unfortunately low bar, and a Google search does turn up a couple independent sources, even if they aren't reliable. I'd say he's notable enough, even if it's not by much in my opinion. –
Compassionate727(
T·
C) 23:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
My searches have found nothing noticeably better and the other two Wikis offer nothing else better. I'm willing to reconsider if substantially better can be found.
SwisterTwistertalk 07:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:31, 30 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170etalk 01:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep.
WP:NACTOR sets an unfortunately low bar, and a Google search does turn up a couple independent sources, even if they aren't reliable. I'd say he's notable enough, even if it's not by much in my opinion. –
Compassionate727(
T·
C) 23:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.