The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment -
Reza Amper, You need to explain on this page why you feel this article should be deleted. If you do not explain the nomination will be closed a a Speedy Keep per
reason #1. --
GBfan11:26, 18 April 2016 (UTC)reply
The article of Mohammed bagheri has been deleted a Speedy in Arbic Wiki
see here by Arabic Manager
سامي الرحيلي (Sa:mi: Arræ'hi:li:) due to he is not important in compare to following:
In particular, individuals will almost always have sufficient coverage to qualify if they:
^Some awards, such as the
Légion d'Honneur, are/were bestowed in different grades and/or have civil and military versions. For the purpose of this notability guide only the highest military grade of such awards qualifies. (
Discussion regarding awards with multiple grades)
Comment -
Reza Amper a couple of points. The deletion of an article on another language Wikipedia means nothing here. Each Wikipedia language is independent and have their one rules. Next the part you quote above is from the English Wikipedia (
here) not the Arabic Wikipedia so the article there was probably not deleted based on our notability guideline. If they did use our notability guideline, they misused it as he clearly passes point #3 in your list as he is a
Major General and according to that article "major general is the highest available rank for current Iranian commanders." --
GBfan12:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Also, what do you think we need to wait for? Are you asking for me to wait from discussing the article until someone else comments? --
GBfan13:52, 18 April 2016 (UTC)reply
You don't think what? That "major general is the highest available rank for current Iranian commanders."? That he clearly passes point #3 in the list you posted above? If it is the first one, the article
major general needs to be fixed, but what the highest rank is does not make that much difference. If it is the second one, we have a very big difference of opinion as he is a general officer. --
GBfan13:22, 18 April 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment -
Reza Amper, You need to explain on this page why you feel this article should be deleted. If you do not explain the nomination will be closed a a Speedy Keep per
reason #1. --
GBfan11:26, 18 April 2016 (UTC)reply
The article of Mohammed bagheri has been deleted a Speedy in Arbic Wiki
see here by Arabic Manager
سامي الرحيلي (Sa:mi: Arræ'hi:li:) due to he is not important in compare to following:
In particular, individuals will almost always have sufficient coverage to qualify if they:
^Some awards, such as the
Légion d'Honneur, are/were bestowed in different grades and/or have civil and military versions. For the purpose of this notability guide only the highest military grade of such awards qualifies. (
Discussion regarding awards with multiple grades)
Comment -
Reza Amper a couple of points. The deletion of an article on another language Wikipedia means nothing here. Each Wikipedia language is independent and have their one rules. Next the part you quote above is from the English Wikipedia (
here) not the Arabic Wikipedia so the article there was probably not deleted based on our notability guideline. If they did use our notability guideline, they misused it as he clearly passes point #3 in your list as he is a
Major General and according to that article "major general is the highest available rank for current Iranian commanders." --
GBfan12:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Also, what do you think we need to wait for? Are you asking for me to wait from discussing the article until someone else comments? --
GBfan13:52, 18 April 2016 (UTC)reply
You don't think what? That "major general is the highest available rank for current Iranian commanders."? That he clearly passes point #3 in the list you posted above? If it is the first one, the article
major general needs to be fixed, but what the highest rank is does not make that much difference. If it is the second one, we have a very big difference of opinion as he is a general officer. --
GBfan13:22, 18 April 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.