- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:45, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Mohamed Zied Chaari
- Mohamed Zied Chaari ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not appear to have attracted the non-trivial interest if multiple independent reliable secondary sources. Only one of the subject's "awards" appears to be notable, and that award has no source given for it, nor any indication what "FIIG" stands for. References given here are to his patent, his book, and his journal publications, none of which are evidence of independent notability. KDS4444 ( talk) 11:33, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 13:49, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 13:49, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 13:49, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Not enough sources. Xxanthippe ( talk) 22:30, 7 May 2016 (UTC).
Keep. Appears to meet criteria 1, 2 and possibly 7 of WP:NACADEMICS while only needing to meet one of these. Supporting this, he is a published author and his speciality of wireless charging is exciting and a sought after technology by manufacturers of electric vehicles as well as robots and electronics, appliances. I found plenty sources in the article. DeVerm ( talk) 00:36, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- thanks for your comment, but subject's entries in GS and GB are tiny and do not appear to meet any of WP:Prof categories. Xxanthippe ( talk) 00:53, 10 May 2016 (UTC).
- Delete. I changed my mind after reading the latest !votes and agree with them to delete per WP:BLP1E DeVerm ( talk) 19:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as the current article is still questionable overall, not convincing for the notability and the improvements. SwisterTwister talk 05:23, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 19:16, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 19:16, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. His patent and the award he got for it seems to be of the WP:BLP1E variety. 19:42, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Per WP:BLP1E. He appears to be only notable for his invention of the wireless charging system, but that is something which in itself doesn't appear very notable. Omni Flames let's talk about it 07:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:45, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Mohamed Zied Chaari
- Mohamed Zied Chaari ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not appear to have attracted the non-trivial interest if multiple independent reliable secondary sources. Only one of the subject's "awards" appears to be notable, and that award has no source given for it, nor any indication what "FIIG" stands for. References given here are to his patent, his book, and his journal publications, none of which are evidence of independent notability. KDS4444 ( talk) 11:33, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 13:49, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 13:49, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 13:49, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Not enough sources. Xxanthippe ( talk) 22:30, 7 May 2016 (UTC).
Keep. Appears to meet criteria 1, 2 and possibly 7 of WP:NACADEMICS while only needing to meet one of these. Supporting this, he is a published author and his speciality of wireless charging is exciting and a sought after technology by manufacturers of electric vehicles as well as robots and electronics, appliances. I found plenty sources in the article. DeVerm ( talk) 00:36, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- thanks for your comment, but subject's entries in GS and GB are tiny and do not appear to meet any of WP:Prof categories. Xxanthippe ( talk) 00:53, 10 May 2016 (UTC).
- Delete. I changed my mind after reading the latest !votes and agree with them to delete per WP:BLP1E DeVerm ( talk) 19:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as the current article is still questionable overall, not convincing for the notability and the improvements. SwisterTwister talk 05:23, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 19:16, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 19:16, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. His patent and the award he got for it seems to be of the WP:BLP1E variety. 19:42, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Per WP:BLP1E. He appears to be only notable for his invention of the wireless charging system, but that is something which in itself doesn't appear very notable. Omni Flames let's talk about it 07:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.