- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Bait30 Talk 2 me pls? 17:33, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mode Plagal ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unknown band. Only sources in this article come from the band's own website. Should be deleted. Glucken123 ( talk) 15:41, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Clearly notable. A quick Google reveals ample independent sources like this, this, this, this, this, etc. Give me a day or two and I'll incorporate them into the article. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 15:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Glucken123 ( talk) 15:41, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Procedural Keep - No evidence that WP:BEFORE was followed and good evidence that it probably wasn't as this was part of a mass-nomination of dozens of articles about Greek culture over the course of a hour. FOARP ( talk) 15:57, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 15:57, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Ghmyrtle sources clearly show they are known and notable, e.g. The Guardian knows about them.-- Eostrix ( talk) 16:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Question: is the Guardian's live review enough to justify encyclopaedic notability? If not, then what other factors should we take into account? I am just asking, because it seems that articles with lack of sources can remain online indefinitely. Glucken123 ( talk) 16:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- See WP:NEXIST in particular, TL;DR, yes, simply lacking references is not a reason for deletion. There is no deadline for adding references to the article, if they are known to exist and can be added. FOARP ( talk) 16:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per Ghmyrtle's sources, and more available. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 ( talk) 13:15, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Bait30 Talk 2 me pls? 17:33, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mode Plagal ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unknown band. Only sources in this article come from the band's own website. Should be deleted. Glucken123 ( talk) 15:41, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Clearly notable. A quick Google reveals ample independent sources like this, this, this, this, this, etc. Give me a day or two and I'll incorporate them into the article. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 15:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Glucken123 ( talk) 15:41, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Procedural Keep - No evidence that WP:BEFORE was followed and good evidence that it probably wasn't as this was part of a mass-nomination of dozens of articles about Greek culture over the course of a hour. FOARP ( talk) 15:57, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 15:57, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Ghmyrtle sources clearly show they are known and notable, e.g. The Guardian knows about them.-- Eostrix ( talk) 16:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Question: is the Guardian's live review enough to justify encyclopaedic notability? If not, then what other factors should we take into account? I am just asking, because it seems that articles with lack of sources can remain online indefinitely. Glucken123 ( talk) 16:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- See WP:NEXIST in particular, TL;DR, yes, simply lacking references is not a reason for deletion. There is no deadline for adding references to the article, if they are known to exist and can be added. FOARP ( talk) 16:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per Ghmyrtle's sources, and more available. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 ( talk) 13:15, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.