The result was delete. There is wide agreement that WP:BLP1E applies. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:49, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
WP:BLP1E; not known beyond local coverage for this FOIA incident. Only additional hits in ProQuest were for passing mentions related to local activism. czar 18:23, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
If reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event, if
If that person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, and if
If the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented. This person meets all three criteria for deletion. This person is only covered in local news sources in the context of a single event, the FOIA incident. This person is likely to go back to being low-profile soon. Finally, the event itself is not significant, as it is only covered in local news sources. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:D9D6:5287:205F:CEBC ( talk) 20:03, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. There is wide agreement that WP:BLP1E applies. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:49, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
WP:BLP1E; not known beyond local coverage for this FOIA incident. Only additional hits in ProQuest were for passing mentions related to local activism. czar 18:23, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
If reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event, if
If that person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, and if
If the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented. This person meets all three criteria for deletion. This person is only covered in local news sources in the context of a single event, the FOIA incident. This person is likely to go back to being low-profile soon. Finally, the event itself is not significant, as it is only covered in local news sources. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:D9D6:5287:205F:CEBC ( talk) 20:03, 7 May 2022 (UTC)