The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 16:41, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The extent of the promotionalism is so great that regardless of possible borderline notability, the article should be deleted. I've notified the ed. who accepted this from AfC in 2010. DGG ( talk ) 00:31, 1 September 2013 (UTC) reply
Delete Nominator is right about the high degree of promotion in the article; if kept it should be trimmed drastically, or converted into an article about his company, MarketRider. There is one significant independent reference, New York Times, but it is about MarketWatch and barely mentions him (calling him one of the company's co-founders, although in the article he is described as the founder). I could find no biographical information to sustain an article about him. -- MelanieN ( talk) 21:38, 1 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 16:41, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The extent of the promotionalism is so great that regardless of possible borderline notability, the article should be deleted. I've notified the ed. who accepted this from AfC in 2010. DGG ( talk ) 00:31, 1 September 2013 (UTC) reply
Delete Nominator is right about the high degree of promotion in the article; if kept it should be trimmed drastically, or converted into an article about his company, MarketRider. There is one significant independent reference, New York Times, but it is about MarketWatch and barely mentions him (calling him one of the company's co-founders, although in the article he is described as the founder). I could find no biographical information to sustain an article about him. -- MelanieN ( talk) 21:38, 1 September 2013 (UTC) reply