The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Subject not shown to meet
general notability guideline. Sources shown are two Telemetro items of 253 words and 190 words, and one Critica item of 146 words; then there is a supposed Instagram post which is also a dead link. According to my
WP:BEFORE scan, this title seems to get next to no attention outside of its home country.
PROD contested by creator. ☆ Bri (
talk)
00:02, 2 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep:The contest in question was a national event held to choose a winner of one of the most renowned international contests such as
Miss World, I see no reason to eliminate it when the sources and links that give truth to said event are mentioned, In wikipedia there are many articles about beauty pageants, especially
Miss World, if it were to be eliminated, each one of them should be eliminated for all countries. And if it is necessary to add more sources that corroborate said event, it can be done because many media covered said election. If you consider it is not relevant, then you should eliminate the same for all countries such as
Venezuela,
Colombia or
Miss Mexico where it is a national event. It was a remarkable event and because someone considers that for her or him it is not, especially if he is a stranger to this kind of national event, it is not the same for everyone, the article reports on who participated and how the winner was chosen.
Evanex (
talk) 8:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Weak keep. The "no attention outside of its home country" isn't a problem. In addition to the ongoing coverage from
Telemetro over several months, the article from Critica appears to be editorially independent (though at first I thought it wasn't).
WP:GNG is met, barely. Thparkth (
talk)15:12, 15 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep (conditional)- my view could change depending on answers to my final point below. The originator of this article
Evanex has also created pages for previous years' Miss Panama contests that have not attracted an AfD request even though the sources are similar to those here. I note that the proposer of this AfD
Bri deleted substantial parts of the present article's text using
Wikipedia:Verifiability as justification, prior to proposing this AfD, restored, then deleted again thus making the article a stub. My view is that a template request for
more reliable sources would have been and remains more appropriate than deletion. I agree with
Thparkth that "no attention outside of its home country" doesn't make the article non-notable per se. However, the live sources are written in Spanish not English. Does this impact on notability for the article being included in the English language Wikipedia?
Rupples (
talk)
21:13, 22 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Subject not shown to meet
general notability guideline. Sources shown are two Telemetro items of 253 words and 190 words, and one Critica item of 146 words; then there is a supposed Instagram post which is also a dead link. According to my
WP:BEFORE scan, this title seems to get next to no attention outside of its home country.
PROD contested by creator. ☆ Bri (
talk)
00:02, 2 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep:The contest in question was a national event held to choose a winner of one of the most renowned international contests such as
Miss World, I see no reason to eliminate it when the sources and links that give truth to said event are mentioned, In wikipedia there are many articles about beauty pageants, especially
Miss World, if it were to be eliminated, each one of them should be eliminated for all countries. And if it is necessary to add more sources that corroborate said event, it can be done because many media covered said election. If you consider it is not relevant, then you should eliminate the same for all countries such as
Venezuela,
Colombia or
Miss Mexico where it is a national event. It was a remarkable event and because someone considers that for her or him it is not, especially if he is a stranger to this kind of national event, it is not the same for everyone, the article reports on who participated and how the winner was chosen.
Evanex (
talk) 8:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Weak keep. The "no attention outside of its home country" isn't a problem. In addition to the ongoing coverage from
Telemetro over several months, the article from Critica appears to be editorially independent (though at first I thought it wasn't).
WP:GNG is met, barely. Thparkth (
talk)15:12, 15 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep (conditional)- my view could change depending on answers to my final point below. The originator of this article
Evanex has also created pages for previous years' Miss Panama contests that have not attracted an AfD request even though the sources are similar to those here. I note that the proposer of this AfD
Bri deleted substantial parts of the present article's text using
Wikipedia:Verifiability as justification, prior to proposing this AfD, restored, then deleted again thus making the article a stub. My view is that a template request for
more reliable sources would have been and remains more appropriate than deletion. I agree with
Thparkth that "no attention outside of its home country" doesn't make the article non-notable per se. However, the live sources are written in Spanish not English. Does this impact on notability for the article being included in the English language Wikipedia?
Rupples (
talk)
21:13, 22 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.