The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to draft. There is no clear consensus for any one outcome, but there is a very clear consensus that this should not currently exist in mainspace, and an somewhat closer consensus that this should not be entirely deleted. Deleting entirely in favor of the draft is problematic, as there is content in the draft that was copied from the mainspace article, raising attribution concerns. There is no reason to expect that further relisting will result in a different outcome.
BD2412T16:30, 8 October 2023 (UTC)reply
I disagree that the page should be deleted. There is a decent amount of sources already, and given that this page was created less than 10 hours ago, we should give it time. I understand your point of view as well and please do the same for mine. Thank you!
C.b.w85 (
talk)
01:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC)reply
C.b.w85 - AFD wording above does not seem to be about how much you have edited the article to date. I think the conflict is about this being a future date. There are also such debates about future elections, etc. My "Keep" comments are below.
— Maile (
talk)
01:57, 25 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep - TOOSOON is an essay, not a guideline. I do not believe in any event, that it is too soon for an event as famous as this. I personally find this nomination a little picky. I know the following is not really a solid argument but here goes: we have more important things to be deleting than something like this. I think on balance, I would not yet have created this article. However, now it is here, there is no need to delete as the event will without question be notable and it's not long before the 2023 contest is over and the next commences. —
MaxnaCarta (
💬 •
📝 )
02:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Draftify: Article has potential but it's too soon. Not enough sources are shown that provide sigcov of the 2024 event specifically, and having one contestant listed isn't helpful to potential readers.
StartOkayStop (
talk)
16:50, 25 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The majority of editors are arguing for Draftification but there are editors here insisting on Keep so I'm relisting this discussion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk!01:55, 2 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment. Miss Universe is not the events of a single evening. It is also the process of choosing and selecting the national nominees in separate national pageants well before the Miss Universe pageant. On that basis, I don't think that
WP:TOOSOON applies. Eastmain (
talk •
contribs)14:47, 2 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Redirect until further notice. It will be notable when it happens. But that's not even on a determined date yet. Unlike the Super Bowl whose dates are known years ahead of time.
Trillfendi (
talk)
21:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment I closed this AFD discussion as Draftify and found that there is already a draft at
Draft:Miss Universe 2024 that might be in better condition than this article. Should it be deleted in favor of this one? Should they be Merged? Or should this article be deleted and the current draft article kept? LizRead!Talk!04:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to draft. There is no clear consensus for any one outcome, but there is a very clear consensus that this should not currently exist in mainspace, and an somewhat closer consensus that this should not be entirely deleted. Deleting entirely in favor of the draft is problematic, as there is content in the draft that was copied from the mainspace article, raising attribution concerns. There is no reason to expect that further relisting will result in a different outcome.
BD2412T16:30, 8 October 2023 (UTC)reply
I disagree that the page should be deleted. There is a decent amount of sources already, and given that this page was created less than 10 hours ago, we should give it time. I understand your point of view as well and please do the same for mine. Thank you!
C.b.w85 (
talk)
01:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC)reply
C.b.w85 - AFD wording above does not seem to be about how much you have edited the article to date. I think the conflict is about this being a future date. There are also such debates about future elections, etc. My "Keep" comments are below.
— Maile (
talk)
01:57, 25 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep - TOOSOON is an essay, not a guideline. I do not believe in any event, that it is too soon for an event as famous as this. I personally find this nomination a little picky. I know the following is not really a solid argument but here goes: we have more important things to be deleting than something like this. I think on balance, I would not yet have created this article. However, now it is here, there is no need to delete as the event will without question be notable and it's not long before the 2023 contest is over and the next commences. —
MaxnaCarta (
💬 •
📝 )
02:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Draftify: Article has potential but it's too soon. Not enough sources are shown that provide sigcov of the 2024 event specifically, and having one contestant listed isn't helpful to potential readers.
StartOkayStop (
talk)
16:50, 25 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The majority of editors are arguing for Draftification but there are editors here insisting on Keep so I'm relisting this discussion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk!01:55, 2 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment. Miss Universe is not the events of a single evening. It is also the process of choosing and selecting the national nominees in separate national pageants well before the Miss Universe pageant. On that basis, I don't think that
WP:TOOSOON applies. Eastmain (
talk •
contribs)14:47, 2 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Redirect until further notice. It will be notable when it happens. But that's not even on a determined date yet. Unlike the Super Bowl whose dates are known years ahead of time.
Trillfendi (
talk)
21:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment I closed this AFD discussion as Draftify and found that there is already a draft at
Draft:Miss Universe 2024 that might be in better condition than this article. Should it be deleted in favor of this one? Should they be Merged? Or should this article be deleted and the current draft article kept? LizRead!Talk!04:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.