The result was redirect to List of dams in Tottori Prefecture. No prejudice against a continuing discussion on whether the list is notable, but that's beyond the scope of this AFD. Mojo Hand ( talk) 01:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
One Source, is a Stub, & WP:BEFORE found nothing. 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk) 00:53, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
"Artificial features related to infrastructure (for example, bridges and dams) can be notable under Wikipedia's GNG."However, I can find no sources to get over the GNG bar. The one in the article is simply from a database with a little bit of bare statistics, and I don't really see anything else beyond that, even searching for the Japanese name. 35.139.154.158 ( talk) 02:09, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
The list passing NLIST or not is a different matter- there's no point creating and adding to non-notable list-pages that can also be deleted. Pointing to no problems having been raised so far and the page being around for a long time is neither here nor there - these are both considered fallacies here at AFD (see WP:LONGTIME). Does any reliable source consider lists of dams in Tottori Prefecture to be a notable subject? FOARP ( talk) 14:50, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability.The last existing consensus on the subject per the bots noticeboard link above is that redirect to list is the thing to do though of course you are welcome to try and overturn that at the talk page of the list or other relevant venue. I think you would be very hard pressed to find RS specifically about a collection of dams in any place. Fermiboson ( talk) 21:41, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of dams in Tottori Prefecture. No prejudice against a continuing discussion on whether the list is notable, but that's beyond the scope of this AFD. Mojo Hand ( talk) 01:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
One Source, is a Stub, & WP:BEFORE found nothing. 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk) 00:53, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
"Artificial features related to infrastructure (for example, bridges and dams) can be notable under Wikipedia's GNG."However, I can find no sources to get over the GNG bar. The one in the article is simply from a database with a little bit of bare statistics, and I don't really see anything else beyond that, even searching for the Japanese name. 35.139.154.158 ( talk) 02:09, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
The list passing NLIST or not is a different matter- there's no point creating and adding to non-notable list-pages that can also be deleted. Pointing to no problems having been raised so far and the page being around for a long time is neither here nor there - these are both considered fallacies here at AFD (see WP:LONGTIME). Does any reliable source consider lists of dams in Tottori Prefecture to be a notable subject? FOARP ( talk) 14:50, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability.The last existing consensus on the subject per the bots noticeboard link above is that redirect to list is the thing to do though of course you are welcome to try and overturn that at the talk page of the list or other relevant venue. I think you would be very hard pressed to find RS specifically about a collection of dams in any place. Fermiboson ( talk) 21:41, 30 October 2023 (UTC)