The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Most of the sources that were coted are trovia. Looking at
WP:BEFORE, there's nothing more reliable source to be found,thus failing GNG.
GreenishPickle! (
🔔) 04:24, 28 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep This is a firm keep for me. Sourcing present needs some work but clears GNG already. The
NBC News source in particular supports notability being established. A
very crude Google News search shows plenty of sourcing available that I'll have to go ahead and work into this article.
12 are ones found trough that crude search. Also found
this criticism of MinuteEarth by the
NCSE.
This source from the
Heising-Simons Foundation should also help support notability. Also
1, [
2,
3 are suitable to incorporate into the article.
Soulbust (
talk) 05:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. Likely SNOW coming on this one. Clearly meets
WP:GNG. Clicking the "Find sources" links in the nomination template gives us more than enough:
Keep I concur with siroχo that there are more than enough sources to warrant an article.
XOR'easter (
talk) 17:18, 28 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep - clearly notable enough with a plethora of reliable sources significantly covering the channel. Looks like
winter's coming soon on this AfD.
PantheonRadiance (
talk) 18:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep It might even be argued that MinutePhysics and MinuteEarth are separately notable, although I see no need to split the article. --
DanielRigal (
talk) 00:12, 29 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Most of the sources that were coted are trovia. Looking at
WP:BEFORE, there's nothing more reliable source to be found,thus failing GNG.
GreenishPickle! (
🔔) 04:24, 28 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep This is a firm keep for me. Sourcing present needs some work but clears GNG already. The
NBC News source in particular supports notability being established. A
very crude Google News search shows plenty of sourcing available that I'll have to go ahead and work into this article.
12 are ones found trough that crude search. Also found
this criticism of MinuteEarth by the
NCSE.
This source from the
Heising-Simons Foundation should also help support notability. Also
1, [
2,
3 are suitable to incorporate into the article.
Soulbust (
talk) 05:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. Likely SNOW coming on this one. Clearly meets
WP:GNG. Clicking the "Find sources" links in the nomination template gives us more than enough:
Keep I concur with siroχo that there are more than enough sources to warrant an article.
XOR'easter (
talk) 17:18, 28 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep - clearly notable enough with a plethora of reliable sources significantly covering the channel. Looks like
winter's coming soon on this AfD.
PantheonRadiance (
talk) 18:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep It might even be argued that MinutePhysics and MinuteEarth are separately notable, although I see no need to split the article. --
DanielRigal (
talk) 00:12, 29 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.