From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Mindspace

Mindspace (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company fails WP:ORG as there is no in-depth coverage. A few press releases, quotes, and brief mentions is all I can find. There is a "Mindspace" that shows up in search results from Israel but appears to be a completely different company in a completely different industry. CNMall41 ( talk) 19:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 21:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 21:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 21:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per WP:PROMO: strictly advertorial content, with no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman ( talk) 21:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Created by near-SPA (only ever edited three articles). Article is promotional, every reference is not independent except the Chicago Trib article which is just a passing mention. MB 23:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete article is a stub with thinly veiled advertising content. Further, no links exist to this page from other pages within wikipedia -- the links that did exist were intended for a company of a similar name in India. UnkleFester ( talk) 03:48, 19 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Fails WP:ORG. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:00, 21 February 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Mindspace

Mindspace (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company fails WP:ORG as there is no in-depth coverage. A few press releases, quotes, and brief mentions is all I can find. There is a "Mindspace" that shows up in search results from Israel but appears to be a completely different company in a completely different industry. CNMall41 ( talk) 19:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 21:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 21:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 21:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per WP:PROMO: strictly advertorial content, with no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman ( talk) 21:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Created by near-SPA (only ever edited three articles). Article is promotional, every reference is not independent except the Chicago Trib article which is just a passing mention. MB 23:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete article is a stub with thinly veiled advertising content. Further, no links exist to this page from other pages within wikipedia -- the links that did exist were intended for a company of a similar name in India. UnkleFester ( talk) 03:48, 19 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Fails WP:ORG. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:00, 21 February 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook