The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I already did a
WP:BEFORE on this article before nominating it for deletion and ran into these references in Serbian. There is not a stretch in these links which is close to WP:GNG. In addition, she hasn't had any international performance which (could) have contributed to much needed coverage, which is absent at the moment. zoglophie13:36, 21 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete - when assessing whether someone is notable or not, it's pertinent to ask "Can we build a substantial biography from the sources available?" The answer in this case is "no".
Politika mentions her along with a few other players. This is a routine results summary for university sport and she is never analysed in any detail.
Pancevo details her winning a national championship, not sure if this is enough of an achievement for us to essentially do away with
WP:GNG. The coverage in the article is weak. She is mentioned twice in the main text and once in a quote from another player.
Srbin has a summary of various Universiade matches. She is mentioned 4 times altogether but it's only in the context of listing the outcomes of the matches. Nothing we can build a biography from as opposed to the stats stub that we currently have.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider)20:53, 2 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete along the same lines as Spiderone. The provided sources fall pretty far short of being significant coverage (mostly just passing mentions), and I haven't been able to find any sourcing myself that would satisfy notability. The NBADMINTON pass doesn't move the needle too much, either:
WP:NSPORTS2022 prop. 5 requires one source with sigcov at a bare minimum, and I haven't seen anything that would clear that threshold.
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
04:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I already did a
WP:BEFORE on this article before nominating it for deletion and ran into these references in Serbian. There is not a stretch in these links which is close to WP:GNG. In addition, she hasn't had any international performance which (could) have contributed to much needed coverage, which is absent at the moment. zoglophie13:36, 21 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete - when assessing whether someone is notable or not, it's pertinent to ask "Can we build a substantial biography from the sources available?" The answer in this case is "no".
Politika mentions her along with a few other players. This is a routine results summary for university sport and she is never analysed in any detail.
Pancevo details her winning a national championship, not sure if this is enough of an achievement for us to essentially do away with
WP:GNG. The coverage in the article is weak. She is mentioned twice in the main text and once in a quote from another player.
Srbin has a summary of various Universiade matches. She is mentioned 4 times altogether but it's only in the context of listing the outcomes of the matches. Nothing we can build a biography from as opposed to the stats stub that we currently have.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider)20:53, 2 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete along the same lines as Spiderone. The provided sources fall pretty far short of being significant coverage (mostly just passing mentions), and I haven't been able to find any sourcing myself that would satisfy notability. The NBADMINTON pass doesn't move the needle too much, either:
WP:NSPORTS2022 prop. 5 requires one source with sigcov at a bare minimum, and I haven't seen anything that would clear that threshold.
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
04:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.