- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Mike Tate
- Mike Tate ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly referenced WP:BLP of a person notable primarily as a state political party chair. This is not a position that hands someone an automatic inclusion freebie just because they exist, but there's no evidence being shown that he passes WP:GNG at all -- three of the five references are to the websites of the state and national chapters of his own political party, which are directly-affiliated sources that cannot support notability, and both of the other two are to non-notable and unreliable blogs. There is no reliable source coverage in real media being shown here at all. Bearcat ( talk) 23:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:00, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:00, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Cannot find any evidence of notability for Tate. AusLondonder ( talk) 08:07, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Run of the mill party activist, failing GNG. I favor automatic inclusion of all political parties, their leaders, and their youth sections, but state party chairs are routine, regularly replaced functionaries — not akin to leaders of national parties. Carrite ( talk) 13:21, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Mike Tate
- Mike Tate ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly referenced WP:BLP of a person notable primarily as a state political party chair. This is not a position that hands someone an automatic inclusion freebie just because they exist, but there's no evidence being shown that he passes WP:GNG at all -- three of the five references are to the websites of the state and national chapters of his own political party, which are directly-affiliated sources that cannot support notability, and both of the other two are to non-notable and unreliable blogs. There is no reliable source coverage in real media being shown here at all. Bearcat ( talk) 23:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:00, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:00, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Cannot find any evidence of notability for Tate. AusLondonder ( talk) 08:07, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Run of the mill party activist, failing GNG. I favor automatic inclusion of all political parties, their leaders, and their youth sections, but state party chairs are routine, regularly replaced functionaries — not akin to leaders of national parties. Carrite ( talk) 13:21, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.