- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus is clear.
BD2412
T
02:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Michelle Keane ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This candidate has not achieved general notability. The one reference here to a national newspaper (article on Michael Healy-Rae visiting a mosque) doesn’t mention Keane. Otherwise, I don’t see that mentions of Keane in Radio Kerry, satisfy WP:NPOL or WP:SIGCOV. Most local election candidates could muster up some passing mention in local press. Iveagh Gardens ( talk) 10:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, and Ireland. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 11:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 11:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 11:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. WP:SIGCOV and WP:NPOL are not met. We do not have sufficient sources to support the text of the article and establish basic facts - not to mention sufficient sources to establish SIGCOV/GNG. Guliolopez ( talk) 11:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. She fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Spleodrach ( talk) 15:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. People do not get articles just for standing as candidates in county council elections, even winning a county council election would still require her to pass WP:NPOL #2 (where the test hinges on sourcing and substance) rather than handing her an automatic notability freebie, and this article is sourced nowhere near well enough to suggest a reason why she would qualify for special treatment over and above other unelected county council candidates. Bearcat ( talk) 16:18, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Very clear-cut case here. A defeated council election candidate with no other claim to notability. Nothing in this article to even make a claim to notability. AusLondonder ( talk) 17:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus is clear.
BD2412
T
02:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Michelle Keane ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This candidate has not achieved general notability. The one reference here to a national newspaper (article on Michael Healy-Rae visiting a mosque) doesn’t mention Keane. Otherwise, I don’t see that mentions of Keane in Radio Kerry, satisfy WP:NPOL or WP:SIGCOV. Most local election candidates could muster up some passing mention in local press. Iveagh Gardens ( talk) 10:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, and Ireland. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 11:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 11:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 11:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. WP:SIGCOV and WP:NPOL are not met. We do not have sufficient sources to support the text of the article and establish basic facts - not to mention sufficient sources to establish SIGCOV/GNG. Guliolopez ( talk) 11:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. She fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Spleodrach ( talk) 15:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. People do not get articles just for standing as candidates in county council elections, even winning a county council election would still require her to pass WP:NPOL #2 (where the test hinges on sourcing and substance) rather than handing her an automatic notability freebie, and this article is sourced nowhere near well enough to suggest a reason why she would qualify for special treatment over and above other unelected county council candidates. Bearcat ( talk) 16:18, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Very clear-cut case here. A defeated council election candidate with no other claim to notability. Nothing in this article to even make a claim to notability. AusLondonder ( talk) 17:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.