- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Yves Michaud (politician). ✗ plicit 08:16, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Michaud Affair
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Michaud Affair ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This has been problematically tagged for over a decade. Seems almost entirely based on self-published primary sources. Has POV issues, and no clear evidence that this is a notable event beyond a news cycle. Wikipedia is not a newspaper or place to post personal interpretations. ZimZalaBim talk 14:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Discrimination, Events, Politics, and Canada. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Yves Michaud (politician) (where this is already addressed in a more succinct way). This is notable enough to be covered somewhere in Wikipedia, but it isn't of enough enduring significance to have its own standalone article as a separate topic from the MNA who was implicated in it. Bearcat ( talk) 15:00, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadette Edit! 02:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect: as suggested seems fine, this "affair" isn't really notable outside of the individual's notability. Oaktree b ( talk) 14:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Yves Michaud (politician). ✗ plicit 08:16, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Michaud Affair
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Michaud Affair ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This has been problematically tagged for over a decade. Seems almost entirely based on self-published primary sources. Has POV issues, and no clear evidence that this is a notable event beyond a news cycle. Wikipedia is not a newspaper or place to post personal interpretations. ZimZalaBim talk 14:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Discrimination, Events, Politics, and Canada. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Yves Michaud (politician) (where this is already addressed in a more succinct way). This is notable enough to be covered somewhere in Wikipedia, but it isn't of enough enduring significance to have its own standalone article as a separate topic from the MNA who was implicated in it. Bearcat ( talk) 15:00, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadette Edit! 02:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect: as suggested seems fine, this "affair" isn't really notable outside of the individual's notability. Oaktree b ( talk) 14:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.