- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:43, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Michael Moriarty (government official) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly referenced WP:BLP of a deputy superintendent for one division of a government department. This is not an automatic inclusion freebie that entitles him to have a Wikipedia article just because he exists, but there's no evidence being shown that he passes WP:GNG at all -- the article is referenced almost entirely to primary sources, such as press releases from his own employer and transcripts of him speaking, with the closest thing to reliable source coverage being a single blurb in the "employment announcements" column of an insurance industry trade magazine. This is not even close to what it takes to make someone like this encyclopedically notable. Bearcat ( talk) 03:57, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 04:07, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 04:07, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete actual heads of state departments at times are notable, but deputy heads of parts of them clearly are not. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 00:32, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:43, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Michael Moriarty (government official) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly referenced WP:BLP of a deputy superintendent for one division of a government department. This is not an automatic inclusion freebie that entitles him to have a Wikipedia article just because he exists, but there's no evidence being shown that he passes WP:GNG at all -- the article is referenced almost entirely to primary sources, such as press releases from his own employer and transcripts of him speaking, with the closest thing to reliable source coverage being a single blurb in the "employment announcements" column of an insurance industry trade magazine. This is not even close to what it takes to make someone like this encyclopedically notable. Bearcat ( talk) 03:57, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 04:07, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 04:07, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete actual heads of state departments at times are notable, but deputy heads of parts of them clearly are not. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 00:32, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.