- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:03, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Mišo Dokmanović
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mišo Dokmanović ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
BLP of an apparently ROTM law professor who shows 5 citations on Google scholar. I can’t see any basis for passing WP:NPROF. Mccapra ( talk) 17:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 17:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 17:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Macedonia-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 17:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. I see little sign of WP:NPROF (he's written a double handful of papers, but the citation record does not show much impact) nor of WP:BASIC notability. A university level award doesn't count for much. A single book with no reviews in sight is unlikely at best to pass WP:NAUTHOR. Russ Woodroofe ( talk) 17:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:03, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Mišo Dokmanović
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mišo Dokmanović ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
BLP of an apparently ROTM law professor who shows 5 citations on Google scholar. I can’t see any basis for passing WP:NPROF. Mccapra ( talk) 17:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 17:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 17:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Macedonia-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 17:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. I see little sign of WP:NPROF (he's written a double handful of papers, but the citation record does not show much impact) nor of WP:BASIC notability. A university level award doesn't count for much. A single book with no reviews in sight is unlikely at best to pass WP:NAUTHOR. Russ Woodroofe ( talk) 17:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.