- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf ( talk) 22:52, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- Messerschmitt Me 334 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No basis in fact other than the designation, everything else is complete nonsense Petebutt ( talk) 01:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per Artw, aircraft types generally considered to be notable enough to sustain an article, subject to the usual guidelines. Mjroots ( talk) 21:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - German Wikipedia has an authoritative paper ref, meets WP:N with that. - Ahunt ( talk) 23:41, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf ( talk) 22:52, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- Messerschmitt Me 334 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No basis in fact other than the designation, everything else is complete nonsense Petebutt ( talk) 01:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per Artw, aircraft types generally considered to be notable enough to sustain an article, subject to the usual guidelines. Mjroots ( talk) 21:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - German Wikipedia has an authoritative paper ref, meets WP:N with that. - Ahunt ( talk) 23:41, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.