The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus.
Stifle (
talk) 10:39, 4 February 2015 (UTC)reply
A lady who created a popular Facebook page. By this definition a bunch of my mates are notable for their own articles. The only claim to notability is the Australian Story documentary, and I don't think that's sufficient on its own.
The Drover's Wife (
talk) 06:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)reply
I will note, that is not her only claim to notability. She is also an actress in a popular web series, on the council of a Tasmania State Government agency, Australia Day Ambassador, Young Australian of the Year finalist, Resilient Australia Award winner, and covered in the many news articles linked.
JTdaleTalk~ 08:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)reply
These look good on a resume, but I don't think any of them, or all of them combined, amount to notability. An article on someone who had done one of these things would get nominated for deletion in a heartbeat. I don't think it makes a huge difference to someone's notability if they've done five of them.
The Drover's Wife (
talk) 11:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Definitely, one of these things would mean nothing, but multiple things do pile up.
JTdaleTalk~
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deadbeef 01:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NORTH AMERICA1000 00:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Weak keep - terrible stub, but she appears to be famous down under for her advocacy.
Bearian (
talk) 21:28, 26 January 2015 (UTC)reply
please explain what you mean by famous, famous does not mean necessarily notable on WP.
LibStar (
talk) 14:55, 29 January 2015 (UTC)reply
delete if she was actually young Australian of the year for her state she would pass but the other awards are minor. but I don't believe the totality of coverage meets WP:BIO. And needs multiple roles to meet WP:NACTOR
LibStar (
talk) 14:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus.
Stifle (
talk) 10:39, 4 February 2015 (UTC)reply
A lady who created a popular Facebook page. By this definition a bunch of my mates are notable for their own articles. The only claim to notability is the Australian Story documentary, and I don't think that's sufficient on its own.
The Drover's Wife (
talk) 06:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)reply
I will note, that is not her only claim to notability. She is also an actress in a popular web series, on the council of a Tasmania State Government agency, Australia Day Ambassador, Young Australian of the Year finalist, Resilient Australia Award winner, and covered in the many news articles linked.
JTdaleTalk~ 08:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)reply
These look good on a resume, but I don't think any of them, or all of them combined, amount to notability. An article on someone who had done one of these things would get nominated for deletion in a heartbeat. I don't think it makes a huge difference to someone's notability if they've done five of them.
The Drover's Wife (
talk) 11:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Definitely, one of these things would mean nothing, but multiple things do pile up.
JTdaleTalk~
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deadbeef 01:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NORTH AMERICA1000 00:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Weak keep - terrible stub, but she appears to be famous down under for her advocacy.
Bearian (
talk) 21:28, 26 January 2015 (UTC)reply
please explain what you mean by famous, famous does not mean necessarily notable on WP.
LibStar (
talk) 14:55, 29 January 2015 (UTC)reply
delete if she was actually young Australian of the year for her state she would pass but the other awards are minor. but I don't believe the totality of coverage meets WP:BIO. And needs multiple roles to meet WP:NACTOR
LibStar (
talk) 14:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.