- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Cayuga Lake with the history under the redirect if someone wants to merge it Star Mississippi 02:56, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
McPherson Seaplane Base
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- McPherson Seaplane Base ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject fails GNG. Sparse coverage of this former seaplane base is mostly ROUTINE government publication lacking SIGCOV. Chris Troutman ( talk) 20:58, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Transportation, and New York. Chris Troutman ( talk) 20:59, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, or redirect if a suitable target can be found. This seaplane port no longer exists. There are no vestiges or ruins of it and it has no FAA call sign. Other than a couple of listings in obscure documents, I have found no sources that discuss it or lend notability to it per GNG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 05:44, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Merge to Cayuga Lake, which served as its runway. Peterkingiron ( talk) 19:32, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - it's non-existent, fails N and V. Worse yet, the internet is using our WP entry about an obscure and non-existent seaplane base. It makes no sense to redirect or even merge. It's misguided false hope for seaplane pilots looking for a base to land. This is the kind of misinformation that originates from our article. That base is not a historic site, and should not be preserved just because it existed for a short time. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Atsme 💬 📧 11:14, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I tagged it for notability and notability it does, indeed, lack! Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 11:31, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Merge to Cayuga Lake would be the best solution, since McPherson Seaplane Base is a part of the lake's history. TH1980 ( talk) 23:08, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Cayuga Lake with the history under the redirect if someone wants to merge it Star Mississippi 02:56, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
McPherson Seaplane Base
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- McPherson Seaplane Base ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject fails GNG. Sparse coverage of this former seaplane base is mostly ROUTINE government publication lacking SIGCOV. Chris Troutman ( talk) 20:58, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Transportation, and New York. Chris Troutman ( talk) 20:59, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, or redirect if a suitable target can be found. This seaplane port no longer exists. There are no vestiges or ruins of it and it has no FAA call sign. Other than a couple of listings in obscure documents, I have found no sources that discuss it or lend notability to it per GNG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 05:44, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Merge to Cayuga Lake, which served as its runway. Peterkingiron ( talk) 19:32, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - it's non-existent, fails N and V. Worse yet, the internet is using our WP entry about an obscure and non-existent seaplane base. It makes no sense to redirect or even merge. It's misguided false hope for seaplane pilots looking for a base to land. This is the kind of misinformation that originates from our article. That base is not a historic site, and should not be preserved just because it existed for a short time. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Atsme 💬 📧 11:14, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I tagged it for notability and notability it does, indeed, lack! Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 11:31, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Merge to Cayuga Lake would be the best solution, since McPherson Seaplane Base is a part of the lake's history. TH1980 ( talk) 23:08, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.