- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:31, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Mayne Berke
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mayne Berke ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not only does the article's single source contain the merest of passing mentions of the subject, but every mention of his name everywhere is merely a passing reference. Very, very far from notability. Central and Adams ( talk) 20:43, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Arts, Film, and New York. Central and Adams ( talk) 20:43, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. There are a fair number of results in ProQuest, Google News, Newspapers.com, etc., but they all seem to be single-sentence passing mentions rather than in-depth coverage. I'm not seeing anything that would make me think that Berke meets WP:NCREATIVE and/or the GNG, though I'm certainly glad to reconsider if there's sigcov that I'm missing. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:45, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:31, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Mayne Berke
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mayne Berke ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not only does the article's single source contain the merest of passing mentions of the subject, but every mention of his name everywhere is merely a passing reference. Very, very far from notability. Central and Adams ( talk) 20:43, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Arts, Film, and New York. Central and Adams ( talk) 20:43, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. There are a fair number of results in ProQuest, Google News, Newspapers.com, etc., but they all seem to be single-sentence passing mentions rather than in-depth coverage. I'm not seeing anything that would make me think that Berke meets WP:NCREATIVE and/or the GNG, though I'm certainly glad to reconsider if there's sigcov that I'm missing. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:45, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.