- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 05:57, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Matty Amendola ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Paid for spam for non notable musician. Has no notability independent of his non notable band. Solo career lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Sourced to interviews, primary and pr. nothing good for GNG. duffbeerforme ( talk) 02:06, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. J 947 ( c), at 03:24, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 04:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Strong Keep to be sponsored by Gretsch Drums you have to be a big deal drummer. There is also non-trivial coverage of the artist. Lightburst ( talk) 04:21, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:09, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- One PR puff piece in a trade mag is not significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme ( talk) 22:55, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - Nahal (T) 20:39, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - Nahal (T) 20:39, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete we need more sourcing than PR puff pieces. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 02:03, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 05:57, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Matty Amendola ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Paid for spam for non notable musician. Has no notability independent of his non notable band. Solo career lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Sourced to interviews, primary and pr. nothing good for GNG. duffbeerforme ( talk) 02:06, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. J 947 ( c), at 03:24, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 04:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Strong Keep to be sponsored by Gretsch Drums you have to be a big deal drummer. There is also non-trivial coverage of the artist. Lightburst ( talk) 04:21, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:09, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- One PR puff piece in a trade mag is not significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme ( talk) 22:55, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - Nahal (T) 20:39, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - Nahal (T) 20:39, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete we need more sourcing than PR puff pieces. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 02:03, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.