The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The sources put forward by GRuban were convincingly rebutted by Dom Kaos and LuckyLouie.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 03:21, 15 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:32, 2 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:49, 9 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - this is just a brief article that does not say much, other than that this man has appeared on some programmes. Appearance on programmes is surely not enough to establish notability.
Vorbee (
talk) 07:45, 9 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete: none of the sources quoted above shows the depth of coverage required to demonstrate general notability: interviews with the subject of the article cannot be considered to be news coverage. Definitely fails
WP:ENTERTAINER.
~dom Kaos~ (
talk) 14:07, 9 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete: Clear
advertisement and
directory page. 4 out of 7 reference links are dead. Of the three that are left, the first is an
advertisement for a benefit that includes, Tickets are $40 plus cash bar, with a phone number for reservations. A blog talk radio reference, has the title
Free Readings with Psychic Medium Matt Fraser!. At the bottom of the article it states Call His Office for Details. www.SimplyPsychic.com.
The last reference is an Amazon link to buying the book or getting it on Kindle cheaper. There is just not enough
notability to pass
GNG.
Otr500 (
talk) 23:03, 12 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete I examined the sources helpfully provided by GRuban and found the majority are interviews that promote an upcoming event or appearance by Fraser, and so fall under
WP:ROUTINE, i.e. "planned coverage of scheduled events, especially when those involved in the event are also promoting it". -
LuckyLouie (
talk) 17:59, 14 December 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The sources put forward by GRuban were convincingly rebutted by Dom Kaos and LuckyLouie.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 03:21, 15 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:32, 2 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:49, 9 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - this is just a brief article that does not say much, other than that this man has appeared on some programmes. Appearance on programmes is surely not enough to establish notability.
Vorbee (
talk) 07:45, 9 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete: none of the sources quoted above shows the depth of coverage required to demonstrate general notability: interviews with the subject of the article cannot be considered to be news coverage. Definitely fails
WP:ENTERTAINER.
~dom Kaos~ (
talk) 14:07, 9 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete: Clear
advertisement and
directory page. 4 out of 7 reference links are dead. Of the three that are left, the first is an
advertisement for a benefit that includes, Tickets are $40 plus cash bar, with a phone number for reservations. A blog talk radio reference, has the title
Free Readings with Psychic Medium Matt Fraser!. At the bottom of the article it states Call His Office for Details. www.SimplyPsychic.com.
The last reference is an Amazon link to buying the book or getting it on Kindle cheaper. There is just not enough
notability to pass
GNG.
Otr500 (
talk) 23:03, 12 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete I examined the sources helpfully provided by GRuban and found the majority are interviews that promote an upcoming event or appearance by Fraser, and so fall under
WP:ROUTINE, i.e. "planned coverage of scheduled events, especially when those involved in the event are also promoting it". -
LuckyLouie (
talk) 17:59, 14 December 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.