The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable aspiring filmmaker. No coverage in any reliable secondary sources. 4 references are dead links and the last is to the shorts he submitted to Funny or Die.
Amsgearing (
talk) 00:06, 14 July 2018 (UTC)reply
That's it. Not one of them is a reliable secondary source that provides in-depth coverage of the subject, with the possible exception of the Film Threat interview from 2004, but if that's all there is, that's not lasting coverage, and he obviously falls far short of what's required in
WP:GNG. Don't even look at
WP:FILMMAKER because he doesn't even come close to any of the 4 requirements there. So, no, there is no "misunderstanding" on the nominator's part - this is a non-notable filmmaker without significant coverage in reliable sources. Sorry. Maybe someday, but certainly
WP:TOOSOON at the moment.
Amsgearing (
talk) 18:11, 14 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment The "
The State Journal-Register blurb" isn't credited (I think you may have mistaken the picture title for the author credit), but in any case I agree, it's not RS.
96.127.242.226 (
talk) 23:04, 27 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Well, what I meant was, it's obviously a boilerplate list of questions that was sent to Brookens, and his replies to those questions are 99% of the piece. Hence, he essentially wrote the piece himself.
Amsgearing (
talk) 17:25, 1 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Lourdes 05:37, 29 July 2018 (UTC)reply
delete I see no significant coverage from independent & reliable sources. Best coverage is interview from local Springfield paper in "Getting to know local artists" section.
Sandals1 (
talk) 14:10, 1 August 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable aspiring filmmaker. No coverage in any reliable secondary sources. 4 references are dead links and the last is to the shorts he submitted to Funny or Die.
Amsgearing (
talk) 00:06, 14 July 2018 (UTC)reply
That's it. Not one of them is a reliable secondary source that provides in-depth coverage of the subject, with the possible exception of the Film Threat interview from 2004, but if that's all there is, that's not lasting coverage, and he obviously falls far short of what's required in
WP:GNG. Don't even look at
WP:FILMMAKER because he doesn't even come close to any of the 4 requirements there. So, no, there is no "misunderstanding" on the nominator's part - this is a non-notable filmmaker without significant coverage in reliable sources. Sorry. Maybe someday, but certainly
WP:TOOSOON at the moment.
Amsgearing (
talk) 18:11, 14 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment The "
The State Journal-Register blurb" isn't credited (I think you may have mistaken the picture title for the author credit), but in any case I agree, it's not RS.
96.127.242.226 (
talk) 23:04, 27 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Well, what I meant was, it's obviously a boilerplate list of questions that was sent to Brookens, and his replies to those questions are 99% of the piece. Hence, he essentially wrote the piece himself.
Amsgearing (
talk) 17:25, 1 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Lourdes 05:37, 29 July 2018 (UTC)reply
delete I see no significant coverage from independent & reliable sources. Best coverage is interview from local Springfield paper in "Getting to know local artists" section.
Sandals1 (
talk) 14:10, 1 August 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.