From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Masato Degawa (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. To be honest I did not fully analyze the non-English sources but everything derived / sourced from them is basic resume-type factiods rather than GNG type coverage. Some concern regarding the creator with 168 lifetime edits and a wiki-expert at edit #1 and all edits have been on individuals who would commercially benefit from having a Wikipedia article. Sincerely, North8000 ( talk) 00:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Comment:
Regarding the nominator's comment about the article creator's other edits: EnigmaSeeker has also created articles about historical figures. These people are presumably gaining little commercial benefit from their articles since they are dead.
-- A. B. ( talkcontribsglobal count) 01:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Masato Degawa (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. To be honest I did not fully analyze the non-English sources but everything derived / sourced from them is basic resume-type factiods rather than GNG type coverage. Some concern regarding the creator with 168 lifetime edits and a wiki-expert at edit #1 and all edits have been on individuals who would commercially benefit from having a Wikipedia article. Sincerely, North8000 ( talk) 00:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Comment:
Regarding the nominator's comment about the article creator's other edits: EnigmaSeeker has also created articles about historical figures. These people are presumably gaining little commercial benefit from their articles since they are dead.
-- A. B. ( talkcontribsglobal count) 01:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook