The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 00:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Unfortunately, looks like another small, non-notable record label that fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. The best sources that I could find were this and this, neither of which provide significant coverage of this company. One of the sources in the article is kept alive here but I couldn't find a way of accessing the other one; it doesn't look like the archived version of it on Web Archive is working. Also note that the article was started by a user called 'Ncut', which is the name of one of the founders. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 00:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Unfortunately, looks like another small, non-notable record label that fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. The best sources that I could find were this and this, neither of which provide significant coverage of this company. One of the sources in the article is kept alive here but I couldn't find a way of accessing the other one; it doesn't look like the archived version of it on Web Archive is working. Also note that the article was started by a user called 'Ncut', which is the name of one of the founders. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)