The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 16:40, 28 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Not notable, sources are all peers, edits done by Marisa Anderson herself, mostly an advertisement for her services.
JCipriani (
talk) 01:24, 21 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Weak Delete There may be a weak case for notability here given the things alleged about her in the article. Unfortunately the sources appear to be compromised by personal and or professional association with the subject. Both
WP:RS and
WP:V seem to be a fail. -
Ad Orientem (
talk) 02:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Take away the self-promotional and fringe-sourced stuff; there's nothing left that meets
WP:GNG. -
LuckyLouie (
talk) 15:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Reads like an advertisement. Can not find any reliable references.
Goblin Face (
talk) 02:42, 24 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Very weak delete I deleted most of the
WP:NOAD violating material. There isn't that much left. She's had enough media exposure that if non-fringe
WP:RS could be found to confirm her notability I might support a keep however if it can't be improved beyond where it is I'd say delete. After noting that the Holzer reference was actually an advertising directory and that the information contending her having an ongoing professional relationship was impossible on account of him being 5 years dead I found one reliable source (which I included) to support that the Grave's End "haunting" spoke toward a notable event - however weakly. However
WP:BLP1E applies now as this event is all that is left. So while it speaks to notability it isn't sufficient on its own.
Simonm223 (
talk) 18:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete The only remaining section "Work with Hans Holzer" suggests that Anderson is not independently notable as per
WP:INHERITED.
Kooky2 (
talk) 11:03, 27 February 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 16:40, 28 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Not notable, sources are all peers, edits done by Marisa Anderson herself, mostly an advertisement for her services.
JCipriani (
talk) 01:24, 21 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Weak Delete There may be a weak case for notability here given the things alleged about her in the article. Unfortunately the sources appear to be compromised by personal and or professional association with the subject. Both
WP:RS and
WP:V seem to be a fail. -
Ad Orientem (
talk) 02:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Take away the self-promotional and fringe-sourced stuff; there's nothing left that meets
WP:GNG. -
LuckyLouie (
talk) 15:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Reads like an advertisement. Can not find any reliable references.
Goblin Face (
talk) 02:42, 24 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Very weak delete I deleted most of the
WP:NOAD violating material. There isn't that much left. She's had enough media exposure that if non-fringe
WP:RS could be found to confirm her notability I might support a keep however if it can't be improved beyond where it is I'd say delete. After noting that the Holzer reference was actually an advertising directory and that the information contending her having an ongoing professional relationship was impossible on account of him being 5 years dead I found one reliable source (which I included) to support that the Grave's End "haunting" spoke toward a notable event - however weakly. However
WP:BLP1E applies now as this event is all that is left. So while it speaks to notability it isn't sufficient on its own.
Simonm223 (
talk) 18:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete The only remaining section "Work with Hans Holzer" suggests that Anderson is not independently notable as per
WP:INHERITED.
Kooky2 (
talk) 11:03, 27 February 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.