The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. 12 years after this heavily-promotional bio was created by a single-purpose editor,
his faculty profile still lists him as an associate professor with one book. That's not success by academic standards. The book has four reviews on JSTOR
[1][2][3][4], enough to be plausibly notable itself but nothing special. So if there were an article on the book we could redirect to it. But even if another book with other reviews turns up (the only candidate I found is
[5] and I'm pretty sure that's a different Mario Santana), giving enough for
WP:AUTHOR, the promotional and dated content of the current article makes it not worth saving. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
06:05, 28 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. 12 years after this heavily-promotional bio was created by a single-purpose editor,
his faculty profile still lists him as an associate professor with one book. That's not success by academic standards. The book has four reviews on JSTOR
[1][2][3][4], enough to be plausibly notable itself but nothing special. So if there were an article on the book we could redirect to it. But even if another book with other reviews turns up (the only candidate I found is
[5] and I'm pretty sure that's a different Mario Santana), giving enough for
WP:AUTHOR, the promotional and dated content of the current article makes it not worth saving. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
06:05, 28 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.