From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:52, 15 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Margie Nichols (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity page constructed exclusively of press releases and primary sources. CorporateM ( Talk) 19:24, 7 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 1000 03:35, 8 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 1000 03:35, 8 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 1000 03:35, 8 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 1000 03:36, 8 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and fails to state a reason the subject should be considered notable in lieu of sources. Googling turned up absolutely nothing useful. The main contributors to the page don't look like SPAs to me, so I'm don't think this is a vanity page. But the subject certainly isn't sufficiently notable to warrant an article. Msnicki ( talk) 03:55, 8 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Could not find much. She might have a weak claim based on awards but the Peabody went to the station she worked for, not her. I can't find confirmation for a regional Emmy that old. The Polk award is confirmed. Vrac ( talk) 13:26, 8 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Question - As Vice Chancellor, does she pass WP:PROF? Bearian ( talk) 01:15, 9 December 2014 (UTC) reply
No. That's an administrative position. Google scholar turns up nothing in the way of citations of her scholarly work. Msnicki ( talk) 01:33, 9 December 2014 (UTC) reply
She is one of 9 Vice-Chancellors at UT Knoxville so she wouldn't qualify on notability as an administrator. Vrac ( talk) 01:41, 9 December 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:52, 15 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Margie Nichols (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity page constructed exclusively of press releases and primary sources. CorporateM ( Talk) 19:24, 7 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 1000 03:35, 8 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 1000 03:35, 8 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 1000 03:35, 8 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 1000 03:36, 8 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and fails to state a reason the subject should be considered notable in lieu of sources. Googling turned up absolutely nothing useful. The main contributors to the page don't look like SPAs to me, so I'm don't think this is a vanity page. But the subject certainly isn't sufficiently notable to warrant an article. Msnicki ( talk) 03:55, 8 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Could not find much. She might have a weak claim based on awards but the Peabody went to the station she worked for, not her. I can't find confirmation for a regional Emmy that old. The Polk award is confirmed. Vrac ( talk) 13:26, 8 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Question - As Vice Chancellor, does she pass WP:PROF? Bearian ( talk) 01:15, 9 December 2014 (UTC) reply
No. That's an administrative position. Google scholar turns up nothing in the way of citations of her scholarly work. Msnicki ( talk) 01:33, 9 December 2014 (UTC) reply
She is one of 9 Vice-Chancellors at UT Knoxville so she wouldn't qualify on notability as an administrator. Vrac ( talk) 01:41, 9 December 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook