The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by
WP:GNG and fails to state a reason the subject should be considered notable in lieu of sources. Googling turned up absolutely nothing useful. The main contributors to the page don't look like SPAs to me, so I'm don't think this is a vanity page. But the subject certainly isn't sufficiently notable to warrant an article.
Msnicki (
talk) 03:55, 8 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete: Could not find much. She might have a weak claim based on awards but the Peabody went to the station she worked for, not her. I can't find confirmation for a regional Emmy that old. The Polk award is confirmed.
Vrac (
talk) 13:26, 8 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Question - As Vice Chancellor, does she pass
WP:PROF?
Bearian (
talk) 01:15, 9 December 2014 (UTC)reply
No. That's an administrative position. Google scholar turns up nothing in the way of citations of her scholarly work.
Msnicki (
talk) 01:33, 9 December 2014 (UTC)reply
She is one of 9 Vice-Chancellors at UT Knoxville so she wouldn't qualify on notability as an administrator.
Vrac (
talk) 01:41, 9 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by
WP:GNG and fails to state a reason the subject should be considered notable in lieu of sources. Googling turned up absolutely nothing useful. The main contributors to the page don't look like SPAs to me, so I'm don't think this is a vanity page. But the subject certainly isn't sufficiently notable to warrant an article.
Msnicki (
talk) 03:55, 8 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete: Could not find much. She might have a weak claim based on awards but the Peabody went to the station she worked for, not her. I can't find confirmation for a regional Emmy that old. The Polk award is confirmed.
Vrac (
talk) 13:26, 8 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Question - As Vice Chancellor, does she pass
WP:PROF?
Bearian (
talk) 01:15, 9 December 2014 (UTC)reply
No. That's an administrative position. Google scholar turns up nothing in the way of citations of her scholarly work.
Msnicki (
talk) 01:33, 9 December 2014 (UTC)reply
She is one of 9 Vice-Chancellors at UT Knoxville so she wouldn't qualify on notability as an administrator.
Vrac (
talk) 01:41, 9 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.