From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 03:11, 23 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Marchex

Marchex (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company. No evidence of awards or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources. Not eligible for PROD, apparently. Stuartyeates ( talk) 08:58, 1 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 13:24, 1 September 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 13:24, 1 September 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:58, 3 September 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:58, 3 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm ( TCGE) 17:31, 8 September 2014 (UTC) reply


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti *Let's talk!* 01:06, 15 September 2014 (UTC) reply

KEEP:

I'm in need of quick research on this company. As such the article could have been helpful. However, it fails to tell me what I need to know in plain English, which is, WTF do they do???? I'd say keep it. It's traded through NASDAQ. 32.214.171.44 ( talk) 15:57, 18 September 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 03:11, 23 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Marchex

Marchex (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company. No evidence of awards or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources. Not eligible for PROD, apparently. Stuartyeates ( talk) 08:58, 1 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 13:24, 1 September 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 13:24, 1 September 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:58, 3 September 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:58, 3 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm ( TCGE) 17:31, 8 September 2014 (UTC) reply


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti *Let's talk!* 01:06, 15 September 2014 (UTC) reply

KEEP:

I'm in need of quick research on this company. As such the article could have been helpful. However, it fails to tell me what I need to know in plain English, which is, WTF do they do???? I'd say keep it. It's traded through NASDAQ. 32.214.171.44 ( talk) 15:57, 18 September 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook