The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non notable company. No evidence of awards or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources. Not eligible for PROD, apparently.
Stuartyeates (
talk) 08:58, 1 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ks0stm(
T•
C•
G•
E) 17:31, 8 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 01:06, 15 September 2014 (UTC)reply
KEEP:
I'm in need of quick research on this company. As such the article could have been helpful. However, it fails to tell me what I need to know in plain English, which is, WTF do they do????
I'd say keep it. It's traded through NASDAQ.
32.214.171.44 (
talk) 15:57, 18 September 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non notable company. No evidence of awards or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources. Not eligible for PROD, apparently.
Stuartyeates (
talk) 08:58, 1 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ks0stm(
T•
C•
G•
E) 17:31, 8 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 01:06, 15 September 2014 (UTC)reply
KEEP:
I'm in need of quick research on this company. As such the article could have been helpful. However, it fails to tell me what I need to know in plain English, which is, WTF do they do????
I'd say keep it. It's traded through NASDAQ.
32.214.171.44 (
talk) 15:57, 18 September 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.