The result was deleteā. Star Mississippi 12:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
This article clearly fails WP:GNG & full of WP:SYNTH mess and WP:OR. MarathaāNizam wars? More like every war against Marathas (as it is mixed up by Anglo-Maratha wars and French conflicts with Marathas) and there's no source for the timeline of this event (1720-1819), clearly fabricated by the author of the page. Neither I found any source explicitly referring to it as MarathaāNizam wars nor did I find sources for its fictional timeline of 1720-1819. Based Kashmiri ( talk) 15:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Timeline isn't mentioned in the heading of article but it is mentioned in the infobox.If there are any doubts some some sources are definitely needed for a better understanding about the timeline with the citation.But if article is undergoing deletion because of it's heading than the Britannca is one of the sources that cites it as 'Maratha -Nizam War' not as 'Anglo-Maratha War'. [4]
Timeline isn't mentioned in the heading of article but it is mentioned in the infobox, that's the issue we don't find this particular timeline in any source. The author too is clearly aware of this therefore they didn't cite any source for this timeline. It's clearly a mix of several hostilities between Nizam, Marathas, Anglos and French and represented as "Maratha Nizam war". Based Kashmiri ( talk) 11:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
822 results in JSTOR [12] almost 3,000 results in ProQuest [13]. and we have several other sources that do not explicitly mention "Maratha-Nizam wars" but provide detailed descriptions of the entire conflicts (a lot in the article itself). I will await the nominator to post the synthesized part on the talk page. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, not a platform for someone to boast their ego.-- Imperial [AFCND] 16:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
The nominator clearly lacks an understanding of what, then why don't you show us a single source covering this event as Maratha-Nizam war (1720-1819)?
Neither the Anglo-Maratha wars nor the French-Maratha conflicts are included; technically, it's feasible to add them since the article's scope covers conflicts between two partiesbe sure. Is it conflicts or wars? It's clearly noticeable from the artificial timeline of this event (1720-1819) that it's heavily synthesized.
the Nizam and the Marathas, regardless of whether they were supported by the British East India Company, the French, or any other entities. I am listing the sources that explicitly state "Maratha-Nizam WarNow that is WP:OR and WP:SYNTH you're mixing Anglo Maratha wars and French conflicts with Marathas just to get a fictional timeline so it can be "Nizam victory", Now I'd say it's also WP:POVFORK and please WP:DONTHOAX. Now let us look at the sources provided by you. The first two sources are identical.
we have several other sources that do not explicitly mention "Maratha-Nizam wars" but provide detailed descriptions of the entire conflictshence proved it contains synthesis. And above too the sources provided by you don't give insights of Maratha-Nizam war 1720-1819. Based Kashmiri ( talk) 03:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
MarathaāNizam wars" basically ends with the fall of the Marathas, as their conflicts lasted till then.At least provide a source to back your statements, this is WP:OR and no WP:UCS doesn't give you waivers for extending the timeline on your own. We're still waiting for you to provide sources for your defined Maratha-Nizam war (1720-1819). Based Kashmiri ( talk) 10:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
"Nominators arguments are nowhere found in the article. I don't understand how this doesn't pass WP:GNG."You also didn't understand that a screenshot from YouTube video is not a reliable source (at Gupta empire talk page), I already replied how this article is fully based on WP:OR, WP:SYNTH, POVFORK and it doesn't passes general notability. Feel free to reply to my response below. Based Kashmiri ( talk) 04:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal bias. Based Kashmiri ( talk) 14:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Recommended: I'd suggest WP:SPLIT for a particular war/conflict/hostility (of course, only ones which are notable). -- Jonharojjashi ( talk)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
07:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was deleteā. Star Mississippi 12:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
This article clearly fails WP:GNG & full of WP:SYNTH mess and WP:OR. MarathaāNizam wars? More like every war against Marathas (as it is mixed up by Anglo-Maratha wars and French conflicts with Marathas) and there's no source for the timeline of this event (1720-1819), clearly fabricated by the author of the page. Neither I found any source explicitly referring to it as MarathaāNizam wars nor did I find sources for its fictional timeline of 1720-1819. Based Kashmiri ( talk) 15:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Timeline isn't mentioned in the heading of article but it is mentioned in the infobox.If there are any doubts some some sources are definitely needed for a better understanding about the timeline with the citation.But if article is undergoing deletion because of it's heading than the Britannca is one of the sources that cites it as 'Maratha -Nizam War' not as 'Anglo-Maratha War'. [4]
Timeline isn't mentioned in the heading of article but it is mentioned in the infobox, that's the issue we don't find this particular timeline in any source. The author too is clearly aware of this therefore they didn't cite any source for this timeline. It's clearly a mix of several hostilities between Nizam, Marathas, Anglos and French and represented as "Maratha Nizam war". Based Kashmiri ( talk) 11:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
822 results in JSTOR [12] almost 3,000 results in ProQuest [13]. and we have several other sources that do not explicitly mention "Maratha-Nizam wars" but provide detailed descriptions of the entire conflicts (a lot in the article itself). I will await the nominator to post the synthesized part on the talk page. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, not a platform for someone to boast their ego.-- Imperial [AFCND] 16:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
The nominator clearly lacks an understanding of what, then why don't you show us a single source covering this event as Maratha-Nizam war (1720-1819)?
Neither the Anglo-Maratha wars nor the French-Maratha conflicts are included; technically, it's feasible to add them since the article's scope covers conflicts between two partiesbe sure. Is it conflicts or wars? It's clearly noticeable from the artificial timeline of this event (1720-1819) that it's heavily synthesized.
the Nizam and the Marathas, regardless of whether they were supported by the British East India Company, the French, or any other entities. I am listing the sources that explicitly state "Maratha-Nizam WarNow that is WP:OR and WP:SYNTH you're mixing Anglo Maratha wars and French conflicts with Marathas just to get a fictional timeline so it can be "Nizam victory", Now I'd say it's also WP:POVFORK and please WP:DONTHOAX. Now let us look at the sources provided by you. The first two sources are identical.
we have several other sources that do not explicitly mention "Maratha-Nizam wars" but provide detailed descriptions of the entire conflictshence proved it contains synthesis. And above too the sources provided by you don't give insights of Maratha-Nizam war 1720-1819. Based Kashmiri ( talk) 03:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
MarathaāNizam wars" basically ends with the fall of the Marathas, as their conflicts lasted till then.At least provide a source to back your statements, this is WP:OR and no WP:UCS doesn't give you waivers for extending the timeline on your own. We're still waiting for you to provide sources for your defined Maratha-Nizam war (1720-1819). Based Kashmiri ( talk) 10:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
"Nominators arguments are nowhere found in the article. I don't understand how this doesn't pass WP:GNG."You also didn't understand that a screenshot from YouTube video is not a reliable source (at Gupta empire talk page), I already replied how this article is fully based on WP:OR, WP:SYNTH, POVFORK and it doesn't passes general notability. Feel free to reply to my response below. Based Kashmiri ( talk) 04:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal bias. Based Kashmiri ( talk) 14:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Recommended: I'd suggest WP:SPLIT for a particular war/conflict/hostility (of course, only ones which are notable). -- Jonharojjashi ( talk)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
07:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)