The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Lack of significant in-depth coverage in reliable sources, i.e. fails
WP:ANYBIO. Heavily promotional.
Rentier (
talk) 14:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
assume good faith on the part of others and to
sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
Keep The facts mentioned in the site are correct. It could be corroborated objectively via various other sources as well. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
125.99.105.214 (
talk) 14:22, 26 September 2017 (UTC) —
125.99.105.214 (
talk) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Keep Has removed major areas where it seemed to be making it look promotional. The page may now be taken off from the delete list. The facts mentioned are True and could be corroborated via various other channels. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Danalazzar (
talk •
contribs) 03:26, 27 September 2017 (UTC) —
Danalazzar (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Delete fails WP:BIO and even his company is not notable.
122.171.75.98 (
talk) 14:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep The data sets are accurate. The company has been massively covered in news outlets in India. It is claimed by various media outlets to be the only global venture that allows rentals to transact via credit cards without the customer having to leave the card details on a third party portal. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Danalazzar (
talk •
contribs) 05:34, 28 September 2017 (UTC) — Duplicate vote:Danalazzar (
talk •
contribs) has already cast a vote above.reply
Keep The individual is covered extensively by Forbes. *<Type - Manoj Nair, Forbes> — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Danalazzar (
talk •
contribs) 05:37, 28 September 2017 (UTC) — Duplicate vote:Danalazzar (
talk •
contribs) has already cast a vote above.reply
Note I've semi protected this page owing to the excess amount of sock/meat participation. I'll leave it to someone else to sign and tag all those. —
SpacemanSpiff 15:39, 28 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Article is well referenced, and subject is notable. --
Axiomus (
talk) 12:46, 3 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete Image has copyright problems. Full of personal unreferenced details. Likely paid for. Not really notable.
Doc James (
talk ·
contribs ·
email) 05:34, 4 October 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Lack of significant in-depth coverage in reliable sources, i.e. fails
WP:ANYBIO. Heavily promotional.
Rentier (
talk) 14:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
assume good faith on the part of others and to
sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
Keep The facts mentioned in the site are correct. It could be corroborated objectively via various other sources as well. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
125.99.105.214 (
talk) 14:22, 26 September 2017 (UTC) —
125.99.105.214 (
talk) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Keep Has removed major areas where it seemed to be making it look promotional. The page may now be taken off from the delete list. The facts mentioned are True and could be corroborated via various other channels. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Danalazzar (
talk •
contribs) 03:26, 27 September 2017 (UTC) —
Danalazzar (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Delete fails WP:BIO and even his company is not notable.
122.171.75.98 (
talk) 14:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep The data sets are accurate. The company has been massively covered in news outlets in India. It is claimed by various media outlets to be the only global venture that allows rentals to transact via credit cards without the customer having to leave the card details on a third party portal. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Danalazzar (
talk •
contribs) 05:34, 28 September 2017 (UTC) — Duplicate vote:Danalazzar (
talk •
contribs) has already cast a vote above.reply
Keep The individual is covered extensively by Forbes. *<Type - Manoj Nair, Forbes> — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Danalazzar (
talk •
contribs) 05:37, 28 September 2017 (UTC) — Duplicate vote:Danalazzar (
talk •
contribs) has already cast a vote above.reply
Note I've semi protected this page owing to the excess amount of sock/meat participation. I'll leave it to someone else to sign and tag all those. —
SpacemanSpiff 15:39, 28 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Article is well referenced, and subject is notable. --
Axiomus (
talk) 12:46, 3 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete Image has copyright problems. Full of personal unreferenced details. Likely paid for. Not really notable.
Doc James (
talk ·
contribs ·
email) 05:34, 4 October 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.