The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Sadly, no evidence of notability. Subject of the article fails
WP:GNG.
WP:NYA and
WP:TOOSOON to merit a page. If ever, certainly not today.
Wikicology (
talk) 21:24, 13 October 2014 (UTC)reply
"'
Mahika sharma"' – artice should not be deleted as it has suitable links and the girl has been working hard in life with helping poor. She has been popular in the state of assam and people are found reading the article.. kindly its assamise film not annamise film. Thnks
User:Wikiwikiperson
Comment I moved it to the correctly capitalized name, so either it is deleted or survives it would be with the correct name,
Mahika Sharma. --
Why should I have a User Name? (
talk) 19:42, 15 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails all notability guidelines. Poorly sourced. Can't even consider for
WP:TOOSOON. Please delete.
Athachil (
talk) — Preceding
undated comment added 11:04, 17 October 2014 (UTC)reply
"'REMOVE ALL KIND OF ISSUES"' why sud the article sud b deleted the source are enough it should not be...wiki is for everyone its not only for you guys who want it to be deleted. We are het fan and we think her hardworking sud get wiki name.. soo pls remove issue asap.. do it nw..
Delete Awful, awful, awful. Notability is questionable, but it at least falls under "Blow it up" (per
TNT).
GenQuest"Talk to Me" 00:31, 18 October 2014 (UTC)reply
article
Mahika Sharma is intresting and have exactly soo many links to prove the person is notsble soo please remove the issue too son — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Wikiwikiperson (
talk •
contribs) 23:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Sadly, no evidence of notability. Subject of the article fails
WP:GNG.
WP:NYA and
WP:TOOSOON to merit a page. If ever, certainly not today.
Wikicology (
talk) 21:24, 13 October 2014 (UTC)reply
"'
Mahika sharma"' – artice should not be deleted as it has suitable links and the girl has been working hard in life with helping poor. She has been popular in the state of assam and people are found reading the article.. kindly its assamise film not annamise film. Thnks
User:Wikiwikiperson
Comment I moved it to the correctly capitalized name, so either it is deleted or survives it would be with the correct name,
Mahika Sharma. --
Why should I have a User Name? (
talk) 19:42, 15 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails all notability guidelines. Poorly sourced. Can't even consider for
WP:TOOSOON. Please delete.
Athachil (
talk) — Preceding
undated comment added 11:04, 17 October 2014 (UTC)reply
"'REMOVE ALL KIND OF ISSUES"' why sud the article sud b deleted the source are enough it should not be...wiki is for everyone its not only for you guys who want it to be deleted. We are het fan and we think her hardworking sud get wiki name.. soo pls remove issue asap.. do it nw..
Delete Awful, awful, awful. Notability is questionable, but it at least falls under "Blow it up" (per
TNT).
GenQuest"Talk to Me" 00:31, 18 October 2014 (UTC)reply
article
Mahika Sharma is intresting and have exactly soo many links to prove the person is notsble soo please remove the issue too son — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Wikiwikiperson (
talk •
contribs) 23:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.