- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:34, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Mahabbat pur vice city
- Mahabbat pur vice city ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable film spamed by creator. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 04:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:58, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:59, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Not entirely sure this shouldn't be a speedy, in fact. Definitely no claims of notability, and I'm not seeing one of importance. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 06:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete (possible CSD G11): A vanity page promoting a short film, illustrated by a selfie of the maker in shades and sourced only to user-submitted sites. No evidence of notability and just over 300 views on Youtube doesn't suggest something has been missed. AllyD ( talk) 06:50, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Strong Delete - doesn't meet WP:NFILM and WP:GNG.No evidence of notability. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:59, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as a case of WP:PROMO and lack of reliable sources coverage at this time Atlantic306 ( talk) 14:28, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy deletable ~ Moheen (keep talking) 05:56, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:34, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Mahabbat pur vice city
- Mahabbat pur vice city ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable film spamed by creator. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 04:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:58, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:59, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Not entirely sure this shouldn't be a speedy, in fact. Definitely no claims of notability, and I'm not seeing one of importance. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 06:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete (possible CSD G11): A vanity page promoting a short film, illustrated by a selfie of the maker in shades and sourced only to user-submitted sites. No evidence of notability and just over 300 views on Youtube doesn't suggest something has been missed. AllyD ( talk) 06:50, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Strong Delete - doesn't meet WP:NFILM and WP:GNG.No evidence of notability. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:59, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as a case of WP:PROMO and lack of reliable sources coverage at this time Atlantic306 ( talk) 14:28, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy deletable ~ Moheen (keep talking) 05:56, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.