The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was
Delete. --
MelanieN (
talk) 01:05, 28 March 2015 (UTC)reply
This is an article about a magazine whose website resides in (404 for me) personal webspace of a domestic ISP. It ha ssuperficial referenciness, but the references don't appear to be about the actual magazine. No evidence of importance is presented. Guy (
Help!) 07:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment -- As a defunct magazine (now a website), I might have said NN. HOwever criticism of UFO-believers is a notable topic. Keeping the article might be useful for recording where the magazine content is to be found. Undecided.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 17:05, 6 March 2015 (UTC)reply
That would make sense if there was any credible evidence that it is or was significant. I find none. Guy (
Help!) 23:24, 7 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk) 17:53, 13 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NORTH AMERICA1000 10:01, 20 March 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was
Delete. --
MelanieN (
talk) 01:05, 28 March 2015 (UTC)reply
This is an article about a magazine whose website resides in (404 for me) personal webspace of a domestic ISP. It ha ssuperficial referenciness, but the references don't appear to be about the actual magazine. No evidence of importance is presented. Guy (
Help!) 07:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment -- As a defunct magazine (now a website), I might have said NN. HOwever criticism of UFO-believers is a notable topic. Keeping the article might be useful for recording where the magazine content is to be found. Undecided.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 17:05, 6 March 2015 (UTC)reply
That would make sense if there was any credible evidence that it is or was significant. I find none. Guy (
Help!) 23:24, 7 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk) 17:53, 13 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NORTH AMERICA1000 10:01, 20 March 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.