The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Nonnotable and promotional. The only usable reference is the first, and it seems to be in the style of an extended press release DGG (
talk )
00:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as I myself tagged it for deletion but it was removed with no other attempts of reconsideration, I examined everything before and there was simply nothing for any applicable notability, nothing at all convincing.
SwisterTwistertalk02:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The Le Devoir ref is a great find: though small circulation, it's considered Quebec's
journal of record (though its politics are a joke, imho). That Laval ref would be primary, though. It's the city of Laval (just north of Montreal) announcing a contract with them. So while it's great for WP:V it wouldn't help with WP:N.
User:Shawn in Montreal (
talk)
12:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Michael, your "other" Le Devoir piece is the same article. And that, I should add, is in the paper's Education section, not business, and appears to be pushing the importance of Concordia University's MBA program and reads more like an advertorial piece. The Creative Cow blog's just a mere mention. And then there are the Laval weeklies, all reporting the same thing, which is the company's ultimately successful bid to webcast city council meetings. For what little it's worth, I've never heard of this company, which appears to be a fairly minor player in Quebec's audiovisual sector. More importantly, based on the news sources I don't think it truly does meet
WP:CORP. Delete per nom.
Shawn in Montreal (
talk)
14:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Nonnotable and promotional. The only usable reference is the first, and it seems to be in the style of an extended press release DGG (
talk )
00:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as I myself tagged it for deletion but it was removed with no other attempts of reconsideration, I examined everything before and there was simply nothing for any applicable notability, nothing at all convincing.
SwisterTwistertalk02:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The Le Devoir ref is a great find: though small circulation, it's considered Quebec's
journal of record (though its politics are a joke, imho). That Laval ref would be primary, though. It's the city of Laval (just north of Montreal) announcing a contract with them. So while it's great for WP:V it wouldn't help with WP:N.
User:Shawn in Montreal (
talk)
12:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Michael, your "other" Le Devoir piece is the same article. And that, I should add, is in the paper's Education section, not business, and appears to be pushing the importance of Concordia University's MBA program and reads more like an advertorial piece. The Creative Cow blog's just a mere mention. And then there are the Laval weeklies, all reporting the same thing, which is the company's ultimately successful bid to webcast city council meetings. For what little it's worth, I've never heard of this company, which appears to be a fairly minor player in Quebec's audiovisual sector. More importantly, based on the news sources I don't think it truly does meet
WP:CORP. Delete per nom.
Shawn in Montreal (
talk)
14:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.