The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
From what I have seen, this film fails
WP:NFILM and
W:GNG, because there is an absence of substantive coverage in reliable, secondary sources. Additionally, none of the individuals involved are notable enough for all of their work to be inherently notable. I actually came to this because it was created by a user now blocked, but there were questions over whether it was G5 eligible, and so the consensus was to PROD their creations. The PROD was removed by another editor who felt this needed a full AfD.
Vanamonde93 (
talk) 17:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep It seems to be a movie with two massively huge Bollywood superstars: Hema Malini and Govinda.
Biwom (
talk) 18:30, 23 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment: Pre-internet coverage online for Indian films is difficult to find. Does that mean anything pre-internet is automatically non-notable? Nope. We look anyway, consider cast and crew and then
WP:CSB and
WP:NTEMP... IE:
MichaelQSchmidt, I'm certainly willing to reconsider my position if enough reliable coverage is provided; but you've provided a bunch of search results of the people related to this movie, which do not really add to notability. Regards,
Vanamonde93 (
talk) 05:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Vanamonde93: I am not asserting
WP:INHERIT, only pointing out the reasonable consideration that as a film is often discussed in relationship to its principles, it is through THAT coverage that we can have a notability, even if one chooses to ignore
WP:NF#Other evidence of notability. Schmidt, Michael Q. 05:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 17:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
SpartazHumbug! 09:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
From what I have seen, this film fails
WP:NFILM and
W:GNG, because there is an absence of substantive coverage in reliable, secondary sources. Additionally, none of the individuals involved are notable enough for all of their work to be inherently notable. I actually came to this because it was created by a user now blocked, but there were questions over whether it was G5 eligible, and so the consensus was to PROD their creations. The PROD was removed by another editor who felt this needed a full AfD.
Vanamonde93 (
talk) 17:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep It seems to be a movie with two massively huge Bollywood superstars: Hema Malini and Govinda.
Biwom (
talk) 18:30, 23 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment: Pre-internet coverage online for Indian films is difficult to find. Does that mean anything pre-internet is automatically non-notable? Nope. We look anyway, consider cast and crew and then
WP:CSB and
WP:NTEMP... IE:
MichaelQSchmidt, I'm certainly willing to reconsider my position if enough reliable coverage is provided; but you've provided a bunch of search results of the people related to this movie, which do not really add to notability. Regards,
Vanamonde93 (
talk) 05:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Vanamonde93: I am not asserting
WP:INHERIT, only pointing out the reasonable consideration that as a film is often discussed in relationship to its principles, it is through THAT coverage that we can have a notability, even if one chooses to ignore
WP:NF#Other evidence of notability. Schmidt, Michael Q. 05:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 17:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
SpartazHumbug! 09:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.