- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. nom withdrawn and no outstanding deletion arguments czar 19:31, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- MAVID ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish that this meets
WP:NOTABILITY. It has been in
CAT:NN for 12 years - hopefully it can now be resolved one way or the other.
Boleyn (
talk)
17:34, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 17:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 17:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 17:46, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. I found several references in Google Scholar. The highest citation count is 347. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 17:50, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep based on the sources found by Eastmain. Mccapra ( talk) 05:08, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Withdraw nomination per comments above. Thanks for your input, Boleyn ( talk) 07:17, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. nom withdrawn and no outstanding deletion arguments czar 19:31, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- MAVID ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish that this meets
WP:NOTABILITY. It has been in
CAT:NN for 12 years - hopefully it can now be resolved one way or the other.
Boleyn (
talk)
17:34, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 17:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 17:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 17:46, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. I found several references in Google Scholar. The highest citation count is 347. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 17:50, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep based on the sources found by Eastmain. Mccapra ( talk) 05:08, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Withdraw nomination per comments above. Thanks for your input, Boleyn ( talk) 07:17, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.